[PATCH v2] util: detect byte order

2013-11-27 Thread Tomi Ollila
On Wed, Nov 27 2013, david at tethera.net wrote: > From: David Bremner > > Unfortunately old versions of GCC and clang do not provide byte order > macros, so we re-invent them. > > If UTIL_BYTE_ORDER is not defined or defined to 0, we fall back to > macros supported by recent versions of GCC and

[PATCH v2] util: detect byte order

2013-11-27 Thread David Bremner
Tomi Ollila writes: > > You may want to amend the '#' out of the line > > +#rm -f _byteorder _byteorder.c > done and pushed. d

Re: [PATCH v2] util: detect byte order

2013-11-27 Thread David Bremner
Tomi Ollila writes: > > You may want to amend the '#' out of the line > > +#rm -f _byteorder _byteorder.c > done and pushed. d ___ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch

Re: [PATCH v2] util: detect byte order

2013-11-27 Thread Tomi Ollila
On Wed, Nov 27 2013, da...@tethera.net wrote: > From: David Bremner > > Unfortunately old versions of GCC and clang do not provide byte order > macros, so we re-invent them. > > If UTIL_BYTE_ORDER is not defined or defined to 0, we fall back to > macros supported by recent versions of GCC and cla

[PATCH v2] util: detect byte order

2013-11-26 Thread da...@tethera.net
From: David Bremner Unfortunately old versions of GCC and clang do not provide byte order macros, so we re-invent them. If UTIL_BYTE_ORDER is not defined or defined to 0, we fall back to macros supported by recent versions of GCC and clang --- I think I got all of Tomi's comments, including the

[PATCH v2] util: detect byte order

2013-11-26 Thread david
From: David Bremner Unfortunately old versions of GCC and clang do not provide byte order macros, so we re-invent them. If UTIL_BYTE_ORDER is not defined or defined to 0, we fall back to macros supported by recent versions of GCC and clang --- I think I got all of Tomi's comments, including the