Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] test: uncaught exception when editing properties of a removed message

2023-03-29 Thread Kevin Boulain
On 2023-03-29 at 07:42 -03, David Bremner wrote: > Thanks for the speedy update. I hate to do this but I think the message > is now _too_ specific. Goldilocks and the three tests I guess. > > In particular, is there some reason to think that the number 54 is > stable here? I'm worried about the

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] test: uncaught exception when editing properties of a removed message

2023-03-29 Thread David Bremner
Kevin Boulain writes: > +== stderr == > +A Xapian exception occurred at message-property.cc:XXX: No termlist for > document 54 > +EOF > +test_expect_equal_file EXPECTED OUTPUT > + > +add_email_corpus Hi Kevin; Thanks for the speedy update. I hate to do this but I think the message is now

[PATCH v2 1/2] test: uncaught exception when editing properties of a removed message

2023-03-27 Thread Kevin Boulain
These two functions don't fail gracefully when editing a removed message: BROKEN edit property on removed message without uncaught exception --- T610-message-property.20.EXPECTED 2023-02-27 11:33:25.792764376 + +++ T610-message-property.20.OUTPUT 2023-02-27