On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 22:50:32 -0500, Austin Clements wrote:
> I'm not sure what the point of the last test is, but this patch
> covered everything I could think of, so LGTM.
Maybe checking that long subject line (possibly split/join sometimes in the
process) keeps it's original form (?)
LGTM
On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 22:50:32 -0500, Austin Clements amdra...@mit.edu wrote:
I'm not sure what the point of the last test is, but this patch
covered everything I could think of, so LGTM.
Maybe checking that long subject line (possibly split/join sometimes in the
process) keeps it's original form
I'm not sure what the point of the last test is, but this patch
covered everything I could think of, so LGTM.
Quoth Jani Nikula on Jan 10 at 9:54 pm:
> From: Mark Walters
>
> ---
> test/notmuch-test|1 +
> test/reply-to-sender | 209
>
I'm not sure what the point of the last test is, but this patch
covered everything I could think of, so LGTM.
Quoth Jani Nikula on Jan 10 at 9:54 pm:
From: Mark Walters markwalters1...@gmail.com
---
test/notmuch-test|1 +
test/reply-to-sender | 209
From: Mark Walters
---
test/notmuch-test|1 +
test/reply-to-sender | 209 ++
2 files changed, 210 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100755 test/reply-to-sender
diff --git a/test/notmuch-test
From: Mark Walters markwalters1...@gmail.com
---
test/notmuch-test|1 +
test/reply-to-sender | 209 ++
2 files changed, 210 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100755 test/reply-to-sender
diff --git a/test/notmuch-test