On Sat, 01 May 2010 14:58:18 +0200, "Sebastian Spaeth"
wrote:
> I sent this one off, but it seems to have gotten lost somewhere. I
> should start using a proper MUA :-).
> Executive summary: Ignore my extended patches, (dme finds his version
> more readable anyway), and take the "get rid of notmu
On Sat, 01 May 2010 14:58:18 +0200, "Sebastian Spaeth" wrote:
> I sent this one off, but it seems to have gotten lost somewhere. I
> should start using a proper MUA :-).
> Executive summary: Ignore my extended patches, (dme finds his version
> more readable anyway), and take the "get rid of notmuc
On Fri, 30 Apr 2010 14:42:45 +0200, Sebastian Spaeth
wrote:
> Just for the record, this is the final cleaned up version.
> Still not sure if dme sees it as an improvement though :-)
David,
Any comment here?
Both versions are fairly equally opaque to me, but I didn't write either
of them. ;-
On Fri, 30 Apr 2010 14:42:45 +0200, Sebastian Spaeth
wrote:
> Just for the record, this is the final cleaned up version.
> Still not sure if dme sees it as an improvement though :-)
David,
Any comment here?
Both versions are fairly equally opaque to me, but I didn't write either
of them. ;-
next part --
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: Sebastian Spaeth
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] Restructure notmuch-hello-reflect
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 15:03:19 +0200
Size: 1316
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100501/5d17cfe1/attachment.eml>
I sent this one off, but it seems to have gotten lost somewhere. I
should start using a proper MUA :-).
Executive summary: Ignore my extended patches, (dme finds his version
more readable anyway), and take the "get rid of notmuch-hello-roundup"
patch.
Sebastian
--- Begin Message ---
Actually, for
This function was "not lispy" according to a comment by dme, and it
also relied on a helper function that used 'cl code. Do away with all
that and provide a hopefully lispy solution that relies on elisp only
to "reflect" a (possibly non-square) matrix along it's diagonal.
Remove now unused notmuch
This function was "not lispy" according to a comment by dme, and it
also relied on a helper function that used 'cl code. Do away with all
that and provide a hopefully lispy solution that relies on elisp only
to "reflect" a (possibly non-square) matrix along it's diagonal.
Remove now unused notmuch
