On Tue, Apr 17 2012, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Apr 2012 13:04:39 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi Jani.
>>
>> Jani Nikula writes:
[ stuff deleted ]
> I don't oppose to your plan, but I don't think I'm up to implementing it
> either. I just cooked up something together
Hi Jani.
Jani Nikula writes:
> notmuch-hello (called also through notmuch-hello-update, bound to '='
> by default) tries to find the widget under or following point before
> refresh, and put the point back to the widget afterwards. The code has
> gotten a bit complicated, and has at least the
On Tue, 17 Apr 2012 13:04:39 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin wrote:
> Hi Jani.
>
> Jani Nikula writes:
>
> > notmuch-hello (called also through notmuch-hello-update, bound to '='
> > by default) tries to find the widget under or following point before
> > refresh, and put the point back to the widget
notmuch-hello (called also through notmuch-hello-update, bound to '='
by default) tries to find the widget under or following point before
refresh, and put the point back to the widget afterwards. The code has
gotten a bit complicated, and has at least the following issues:
1) All the individual
notmuch-hello (called also through notmuch-hello-update, bound to '='
by default) tries to find the widget under or following point before
refresh, and put the point back to the widget afterwards. The code has
gotten a bit complicated, and has at least the following issues:
1) All the individual
On Tue, 17 Apr 2012 13:04:39 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
dmitry.kuroch...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Jani.
Jani Nikula j...@nikula.org writes:
notmuch-hello (called also through notmuch-hello-update, bound to '='
by default) tries to find the widget under or following point before
refresh, and
On Tue, Apr 17 2012, Jani Nikula j...@nikula.org wrote:
On Tue, 17 Apr 2012 13:04:39 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
dmitry.kuroch...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Jani.
Jani Nikula j...@nikula.org writes:
[ stuff deleted ]
I don't oppose to your plan, but I don't think I'm up to implementing it
either.
