[Sam Halliday] Re: github mirror

On Sun, 27 Apr 2014, Sam Halliday wrote: > Sorry, I replied to jani and not the list... ...and I in turn replied to the private message. Oops. Let's try again. On Sun, 27 Apr 2014, Sam Halliday wrote: > In my experience the github pull review process is by far superior to > any other solution.

[Sam Halliday] Re: github mirror

and another one -- next part -- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Sam Halliday Subject: Re: github mirror Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2014 19:29:54 +0100 Size: 1858 URL:

[Sam Halliday] Re: github mirror

Sorry, I replied to jani and not the list... -- next part -- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Sam Halliday Subject: Re: github mirror Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2014 18:57:47 +0100 Size: 4752 URL:

[Sam Halliday] Re: github mirror

Sorry, I replied to jani and not the list... ---BeginMessage--- Jani Nikula j...@nikula.org writes: We also maintain fairly high standards for the contributions we accept, so the review has a significant role in the process. In my experience the github pull review process is by far superior to

[Sam Halliday] Re: github mirror

and another one ---BeginMessage--- Sam Halliday sam.halli...@gmail.com writes: If I were to do anything with notmuch it would be improving syncing with gmail (so a tag in notmuch equates to a label in their interface) or at the very least sharing the same tag structure across multiple notmuch

Re: [Sam Halliday] Re: github mirror

On Sun, 27 Apr 2014, Sam Halliday sam.halli...@gmail.com wrote: Sorry, I replied to jani and not the list... ...and I in turn replied to the private message. Oops. Let's try again. On Sun, 27 Apr 2014, Sam Halliday sam.halli...@gmail.com wrote: In my experience the github pull review process