I'm tring to figure out how to use afew. It looks interesting, but
gives me surprising results.
I did `afew --learn spam -- tag:spam` and believe this tells afew that
all the messages matching tag:spam should be classified as spam. But if
that is right, why would `afew -c spam -- tag:spam` then
I'm tring to figure out how to use afew. It looks interesting, but
gives me surprising results.
I did `afew --learn spam -- tag:spam` and believe this tells afew that
all the messages matching tag:spam should be classified as spam. But if
that is right, why would `afew -c spam -- tag:spam` then
Quoting Kazuo Teramoto (2012-01-20 22:55:08)
>On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 12:26:05PM +0100, Justus Winter wrote:
>> Quoting Patrick Totzke (2012-01-20 11:40:41)
>> >I suspect you don't split the config value and thus afew ended up
>> >with a false tag "new;". its just cosmetics but nevertheless..
>>
>
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 12:26:05PM +0100, Justus Winter wrote:
> Quoting Patrick Totzke (2012-01-20 11:40:41)
> >I suspect you don't split the config value and thus afew ended up
> >with a false tag "new;". its just cosmetics but nevertheless..
>
> Hm, actually it does exactly that:
>
> def get_n
Quoting Kazuo Teramoto (2012-01-20 22:55:08)
>On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 12:26:05PM +0100, Justus Winter wrote:
>> Quoting Patrick Totzke (2012-01-20 11:40:41)
>> >I suspect you don't split the config value and thus afew ended up
>> >with a false tag "new;". its just cosmetics but nevertheless..
>>
>
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 12:26:05PM +0100, Justus Winter wrote:
> Quoting Patrick Totzke (2012-01-20 11:40:41)
> >I suspect you don't split the config value and thus afew ended up
> >with a false tag "new;". its just cosmetics but nevertheless..
>
> Hm, actually it does exactly that:
>
> def get_n
Quoting Patrick Totzke (2012-01-20 11:40:41)
>Quoting Justus Winter (2011-12-21 08:53:23)
>>Hey Pazz,
>>
>>Quoting Patrick Totzke (2011-12-19 19:17:12)
>>>Also, should i not get some output when calling afew with -vv ?
>>
>>Yes you should ;). Here's an example run on my box:
>Alright, I do get logg
Quoting Justus Winter (2011-12-21 08:53:23)
>Hey Pazz,
>
>Quoting Patrick Totzke (2011-12-19 19:17:12)
>>Also, should i not get some output when calling afew with -vv ?
>
>Yes you should ;). Here's an example run on my box:
Alright, I do get logging output with upstream master thanks.
FYI: I found
Quoting Patrick Totzke (2012-01-20 11:40:41)
>Quoting Justus Winter (2011-12-21 08:53:23)
>>Hey Pazz,
>>
>>Quoting Patrick Totzke (2011-12-19 19:17:12)
>>>Also, should i not get some output when calling afew with -vv ?
>>
>>Yes you should ;). Here's an example run on my box:
>Alright, I do get logg
Quoting Justus Winter (2011-12-21 08:53:23)
>Hey Pazz,
>
>Quoting Patrick Totzke (2011-12-19 19:17:12)
>>Also, should i not get some output when calling afew with -vv ?
>
>Yes you should ;). Here's an example run on my box:
Alright, I do get logging output with upstream master thanks.
FYI: I found
Hey Pazz,
Quoting Patrick Totzke (2011-12-19 19:17:12)
>Also, should i not get some output when calling afew with -vv ?
Yes you should ;). Here's an example run on my box:
teythoon at thinkbox ~/repos/afew (git)-[master] % python3.2 bin/afew -vv --tag
--new
INFO:root:Tagging spam messages
DEBUG
Hey Jamie :)
Quoting Jameson Graef Rollins (2011-12-19 18:57:00)
>On Mon, 19 Dec 2011 15:13:51 +0100, Justus Winter <4winter at
>informatik.uni-hamburg.de> wrote:
>> Is your new tag called 'is:new'? Mine is just called 'new'
>
>is: is a search prefix, synonymous with tag:
Ah, thanks for the clar
Hey Pazz,
Quoting Patrick Totzke (2011-12-19 19:17:12)
>Also, should i not get some output when calling afew with -vv ?
Yes you should ;). Here's an example run on my box:
teythoon@thinkbox ~/repos/afew (git)-[master] % python3.2 bin/afew -vv --tag
--new
INFO:root:Tagging spam messages
DEBUG:ro
Hey Jamie :)
Quoting Jameson Graef Rollins (2011-12-19 18:57:00)
>On Mon, 19 Dec 2011 15:13:51 +0100, Justus Winter
><4win...@informatik.uni-hamburg.de> wrote:
>> Is your new tag called 'is:new'? Mine is just called 'new'
>
>is: is a search prefix, synonymous with tag:
Ah, thanks for the clarifi
Quoting Jameson Graef Rollins (2011-12-19 17:57:00)
>On Mon, 19 Dec 2011 15:13:51 +0100, Justus Winter <4winter at
>informatik.uni-hamburg.de> wrote:
>> Is your new tag called 'is:new'? Mine is just called 'new'
>
>is: is a search prefix, synonymous with tag:
Apologies, that was misleading:
my ne
Hey Pazz :)
Quoting Patrick Totzke (2011-12-14 17:59:43)
>Hi Justus,
>
>I have just tried your script and have some questions/remarks about it:
>
>* mkdir -p ~/.config/afew ~/.local/share/afew/categories
> As far as I can see, this is not needed if one doesn't use ClassifyingFilter,
> so its OK
Quoting Jameson Graef Rollins (2011-12-19 17:57:00)
>On Mon, 19 Dec 2011 15:13:51 +0100, Justus Winter
><4win...@informatik.uni-hamburg.de> wrote:
>> Is your new tag called 'is:new'? Mine is just called 'new'
>
>is: is a search prefix, synonymous with tag:
Apologies, that was misleading:
my new t
On Mon, 19 Dec 2011 15:13:51 +0100, Justus Winter
<4win...@informatik.uni-hamburg.de> wrote:
> Is your new tag called 'is:new'? Mine is just called 'new'
is: is a search prefix, synonymous with tag:
> That could be a problem since 'new' as tag for new mails is currently
> hardcoded at various lo
On Mon, 19 Dec 2011 15:13:51 +0100, Justus Winter <4winter at
informatik.uni-hamburg.de> wrote:
> Is your new tag called 'is:new'? Mine is just called 'new'
is: is a search prefix, synonymous with tag:
> That could be a problem since 'new' as tag for new mails is currently
> hardcoded at various
Hey Pazz :)
Quoting Patrick Totzke (2011-12-14 17:59:43)
>Hi Justus,
>
>I have just tried your script and have some questions/remarks about it:
>
>* mkdir -p ~/.config/afew ~/.local/share/afew/categories
> As far as I can see, this is not needed if one doesn't use ClassifyingFilter,
> so its OK
Hi Justus,
I have just tried your script and have some questions/remarks about it:
* mkdir -p ~/.config/afew ~/.local/share/afew/categories
As far as I can see, this is not needed if one doesn't use ClassifyingFilter,
so its OK not to do this directly from the setup.py somehow.
But it would
Quoting Kazuo Teramoto (2011-12-14 12:24:14)
>an universal tagging solution with some fancy features
>From: Kazuo Teramoto
>In-Reply-To:
>On 2011-12-14T08:42:36, Justus Winter wrote:
>>I'd like to introduce my initial tagging approach, afew tags:
>>
>>https://github.com/teythoon/afew
>>
>
>Very g
On Wed, 14 Dec 2011 11:42:36 +0100, Justus Winter <4winter at
informatik.uni-hamburg.de> wrote:
> https://github.com/teythoon/afew
>
> It has some nifty features, citing the README:
"""
Basic tagging stuff requires no configuration, just run
$ afew --tag --new
To do this automatically you can
Hey everyone :)
I'd like to introduce my initial tagging approach, afew tags:
https://github.com/teythoon/afew
It has some nifty features, citing the README:
* text classification, magic tags aka the mailing list without server
* spam handling (flush all tags, add spam)
* killed thread handling
an universal tagging solution with some fancy features
From: Kazuo Teramoto
In-Reply-To:
On 2011-12-14T08:42:36, Justus Winter wrote:
>I'd like to introduce my initial tagging approach, afew tags:
>
>https://github.com/teythoon/afew
>
Very good! Thanks for it. I'm using it as my only fil
Hi Justus,
I have just tried your script and have some questions/remarks about it:
* mkdir -p ~/.config/afew ~/.local/share/afew/categories
As far as I can see, this is not needed if one doesn't use ClassifyingFilter,
so its OK not to do this directly from the setup.py somehow.
But it would
On Wed, 14 Dec 2011 11:42:36 +0100, Justus Winter
<4win...@informatik.uni-hamburg.de> wrote:
> https://github.com/teythoon/afew
>
> It has some nifty features, citing the README:
"""
Basic tagging stuff requires no configuration, just run
$ afew --tag --new
To do this automatically you can add
Quoting Kazuo Teramoto (2011-12-14 12:24:14)
>an universal tagging solution with some fancy features
>From: Kazuo Teramoto
>In-Reply-To:
>On 2011-12-14T08:42:36, Justus Winter wrote:
>>I'd like to introduce my initial tagging approach, afew tags:
>>
>>https://github.com/teythoon/afew
>>
>
>Very g
an universal tagging solution with some fancy features
From: Kazuo Teramoto
In-Reply-To:
On 2011-12-14T08:42:36, Justus Winter wrote:
>I'd like to introduce my initial tagging approach, afew tags:
>
>https://github.com/teythoon/afew
>
Very good! Thanks for it. I'm using it as my only fil
Hey everyone :)
I'd like to introduce my initial tagging approach, afew tags:
https://github.com/teythoon/afew
It has some nifty features, citing the README:
* text classification, magic tags aka the mailing list without server
* spam handling (flush all tags, add spam)
* killed thread handling
30 matches
Mail list logo
