First of all, apologies for taking so long to get back to this.
On Fri, 27 Nov 2009, Carl Worth wrote:
> The auto-detection is just three additional stats (at most) for each
> directory, right? That seems cheap enough to me.
If that's cheap enough, then I won't disagree with auto-detection.
On Thu, 26 Nov 2009 22:12:02 +0100, Michiel Buddingh' wrote:
> Carl Worth wrote:
> I considered that approach; ideally, we could test for the presence of
> all three of cur, tmp and new--but this is rather messy to do in the
> current treewalk structure. Taking any one of them as proof
On 26-11 22:53, Ingmar Vanhassel wrote:
> Excerpts from Michiel Buddingh''s message of Thu Nov 26 22:12:02 +0100 2009:
> > Haven't tested it, but it seems you can put
> >
> > [core]
> > whitespace = trailing-space,space-before-tab
> >
> > into your ~/.gitconfig now. I've also set emacs to
On 26-11 22:53, Ingmar Vanhassel wrote:
Excerpts from Michiel Buddingh''s message of Thu Nov 26 22:12:02 +0100 2009:
Haven't tested it, but it seems you can put
[core]
whitespace = trailing-space,space-before-tab
into your ~/.gitconfig now. I've also set emacs to mark trailing
Excerpts from Michiel Buddingh''s message of Thu Nov 26 22:12:02 +0100 2009:
> Haven't tested it, but it seems you can put
>
> [core]
> whitespace = trailing-space,space-before-tab
>
> into your ~/.gitconfig now. I've also set emacs to mark trailing
> whitespace with big red markers.
I
Carl Worth wrote:
> > +" The other value is 'storage_type', which can currently be set to\n"
> > +" 'maildir' or 'none'.\n";
>
> This part of the patch I don't like. I've got a mail collection spanning
> over a decade, and it's seen a lot of strange things. Most of my mail is
> in maildir
On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 10:33:53 +0100, Michiel Buddingh' wrote:
> On the positive side, this allows us to map these flags onto tags,
> at least for indexing (the patch at the bottom implements this), and,
> if I can pry you away from your principles, later for modification
> as well.
Hi Michiel,
Hi Michiel,
> "MB" == Michiel Buddingh' writes:
MB> Dirk-Jan C. Binnema wrote:
Michiel> +
Michiel> +static void
Michiel> +derive_tags_from_maildir_flags (notmuch_message_t
Michiel> *message, const char *
Michiel> path)
>>
>> I see you don't handle the "N"
Dirk-Jan C. Binnema wrote:
> Michiel> +
> Michiel> +static void
> Michiel> +derive_tags_from_maildir_flags (notmuch_message_t
> Michiel> *message, const char *
> Michiel> path)
>
> I see you don't handle the "N" -- is that deliberate? Also, a
> minor addition may to also
Carl Worth wrote:
> > A Maildir-aware notmuch could incorporate this to be far more
> > resistant to bulk mail moves done by other clients, by using
> > filename lookups to avoid accessing and parsing the mail
> > files themselves.
> I don't think opening a file to read out a message ID will
[quick reply to the text without looking at the patch yet]
On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 10:33:53 +0100, Michiel Buddingh' wrote:
> Thanks, and apologies for the accidental base64 encoding.
Thanks for noticing. That would have been a tricky patch to reply to to
comment on.
> On the positive side, this
Hi Michiel,
> "Michiel" == Michiel Buddingh' writes:
Michiel> Another thing; notmuch currently indexes by message-id (or SHA-1
Michiel> hash if that is not present). Maildir, on the other hand, uses
Michiel> file names as stable (when stripped of the parts trailing the
> "Carl" == Carl Worth writes:
Carl> On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 00:25:43 +0100, Michiel Buddingh'
Carl> wrote:
Carl> Hi Michel, welcome to Notmuch!
>> Any attempt to match tags up to directories will eventually have
>> to deal with with the fact that tags can't be neatly
On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 05:04:56 +0100, Carl Worth wrote:
> Hi Michel, welcome to Notmuch!
Thanks, and apologies for the accidental base64 encoding.
First things first:
>> In the mean time, I've made a smaller, hopefully more harmless
>> patch to let 'notmuch new' mark messages stored in a
On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 00:25:43 +0100, Michiel Buddingh' wrote:
> (hi, new here, just subscribed today. Wanted to reply to Carl's
> earlier message I read in the archives, but since I don't have that,
> I'm replying to Bart's reply to that message)
Hi Michel, welcome to Notmuch!
> Any attempt
On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 19:39:22 +0100, Carl Worth wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 21:25:28 +0530, aneesh.kumar at linux.vnet.ibm.com
> (Aneesh Kumar K.V) wrote:
> A fantastic patch, Aneesh! I think this will be handy for a lot of
> people importing mail from all kinds of systems. This is pushed now.
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 21:25:28 +0530, aneesh.kumar at linux.vnet.ibm.com (Aneesh
Kumar K.V) wrote:
> This patch adds maildir directory name as the tag name for
> messages. This helps in adding tags using filtering already
> provided by procmail.
A fantastic patch, Aneesh! I think this will be
* Carl Worth [091121 15:28]:
> And sadly, I just pulled it out again.
>
> I realized that I actually don't want my mail tagged based on the
> maildir directories I'm using, (they are arbitrarily-named directories
> used only to keep the per-directory number of files below about 10
> thousand).
>
>From 24711481dfe770417aa0a13308a9bb842dfb03f4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.ku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 21:20:12 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] notmuch: Add Maildir directory name as tag name for messages
This patch adds maildir directory name a
19 matches
Mail list logo
