[notmuch] [Sebastian Spaeth] Pull requests

On Fri, 09 Apr 2010, Sebastian Spaeth wrote: > On 2010-04-08, Michal Sojka wrote: > > I think that the patch you sent was not the latest version. The latest > > is in id:1265122868-12133-1-git-send-email-sojkam1 at fel.cvut.cz, but it > > is not rebased to the current master. > > Not sure what I

[notmuch] [Sebastian Spaeth] Pull requests

On 2010-04-08, Michal Sojka wrote: > I think that the patch you sent was not the latest version. The latest > is in id:1265122868-12133-1-git-send-email-sojkam1 at fel.cvut.cz, but it > is not rebased to the current master. Not sure what I am doing wrong, but with this patch even after a

Re: [notmuch] [Sebastian Spaeth] Pull requests

On 2010-04-08, Michal Sojka wrote: I think that the patch you sent was not the latest version. The latest is in id:1265122868-12133-1-git-send-email-sojk...@fel.cvut.cz, but it is not rebased to the current master. Not sure what I am doing wrong, but with this patch even after a

Re: [notmuch] [Sebastian Spaeth] Pull requests

On Fri, 09 Apr 2010, Sebastian Spaeth wrote: On 2010-04-08, Michal Sojka wrote: I think that the patch you sent was not the latest version. The latest is in id:1265122868-12133-1-git-send-email-sojk...@fel.cvut.cz, but it is not rebased to the current master. Not sure what I am doing

[notmuch] [Sebastian Spaeth] Pull requests

On Wed, 07 Apr 2010, micah anderson wrote: > On 2010-03-27, micah anderson wrote: > > On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 22:50:52 -0400, micah anderson > > wrote: > > > On Mon, 01 Mar 2010 15:57:00 +0100, "Sebastian Spaeth" > > SSpaeth.de> wrote: > > > > > > > From git repository

Re: [notmuch] [Sebastian Spaeth] Pull requests

On Wed, 07 Apr 2010, micah anderson wrote: On 2010-03-27, micah anderson wrote: On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 22:50:52 -0400, micah anderson mi...@riseup.net wrote: On Mon, 01 Mar 2010 15:57:00 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth sebast...@sspaeth.de wrote: From git repository

[notmuch] [Sebastian Spaeth] Pull requests

On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 22:50:52 -0400, micah anderson wrote: > The only other patch that I find absolutely crucial, that you do not > include, is the 'Preserve folder information when indexing' patch which, > although not perfect, does significantly change my life. This, (along with "allow

[notmuch] [Sebastian Spaeth] Pull requests

On Mon, 01 Mar 2010 15:57:00 +0100, "Sebastian Spaeth" wrote: > >From git repository git://github.com/spaetz/notmuch-all-feature.git I > would like to advocate the following branches for quick pulling. Each > contains 1 or 2 patches. They have all been based on todays > cworth/master, so it

[notmuch] [Sebastian Spaeth] Pull requests

On 2010-04-07, micah anderson wrote: > > > The only other patch that I find absolutely crucial, that you do not > > > include, is the 'Preserve folder information when indexing' patch which, > > > although not perfect, does significantly change my life. This patch in included in my branch now.

[notmuch] [Sebastian Spaeth] Pull requests

On 2010-03-27, micah anderson wrote: > On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 22:50:52 -0400, micah anderson > wrote: > > On Mon, 01 Mar 2010 15:57:00 +0100, "Sebastian Spaeth" > SSpaeth.de> wrote: > > > > > From git repository git://github.com/spaetz/notmuch-all-feature.git I > > > would like to advocate the

Re: [notmuch] [Sebastian Spaeth] Pull requests

On 2010-04-07, micah anderson wrote: The only other patch that I find absolutely crucial, that you do not include, is the 'Preserve folder information when indexing' patch which, although not perfect, does significantly change my life. This patch in included in my branch now. There is a

Re: [notmuch] [Sebastian Spaeth] Pull requests

On Mon, 01 Mar 2010 15:57:00 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth sebast...@sspaeth.de wrote: From git repository git://github.com/spaetz/notmuch-all-feature.git I would like to advocate the following branches for quick pulling. Each contains 1 or 2 patches. They have all been based on todays

Re: [notmuch] [Sebastian Spaeth] Pull requests

On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 22:50:52 -0400, micah anderson mi...@riseup.net wrote: The only other patch that I find absolutely crucial, that you do not include, is the 'Preserve folder information when indexing' patch which, although not perfect, does significantly change my life. This, (along with

Re: [notmuch] [Sebastian Spaeth] Pull requests

On 2010-03-27, micah anderson wrote: On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 22:50:52 -0400, micah anderson mi...@riseup.net wrote: On Mon, 01 Mar 2010 15:57:00 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth sebast...@sspaeth.de wrote: From git repository git://github.com/spaetz/notmuch-all-feature.git I would like to

[notmuch] [Sebastian Spaeth] Pull requests

On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 22:50:52 -0400, micah anderson wrote: > On Mon, 01 Mar 2010 15:57:00 +0100, "Sebastian Spaeth" SSpaeth.de> wrote: > > > From git repository git://github.com/spaetz/notmuch-all-feature.git I > > would like to advocate the following branches for quick pulling. Each > >

[notmuch] [Sebastian Spaeth] Pull requests

On Mon, 01 Mar 2010 15:57:00 +0100, "Sebastian Spaeth" wrote: > From git repository git://github.com/spaetz/notmuch-all-feature.git I > would like to advocate the following branches for quick pulling. Each > contains 1 or 2 patches. They have all been based on todays > cworth/master, so it

Re: [notmuch] [Sebastian Spaeth] Pull requests

On Mon, 01 Mar 2010 15:57:00 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth sebast...@sspaeth.de wrote: From git repository git://github.com/spaetz/notmuch-all-feature.git I would like to advocate the following branches for quick pulling. Each contains 1 or 2 patches. They have all been based on todays

[notmuch] [Sebastian Spaeth] Pull requests

Resending as this did not get through the list somehow. Sorry, if it pops up twice now -- next part -- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Sebastian Spaeth Subject: no subject Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2010 15:13:31 +0100 Size: 2430 URL:

[notmuch] [Sebastian Spaeth] Pull requests

Resending as this did not get through the list somehow. Sorry, if it pops up twice now ---BeginMessage--- From git repository git://github.com/spaetz/notmuch-all-feature.git I would like to advocate the following branches for quick pulling. Each contains 1 or 2 patches. They have all been based