On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 09:55:43 -0800, Carl Worth wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 17:05:06 +0100, Jed Brown wrote:
> > Handling this is a bit messy, I think we want the current behavior
> > unless To matches Reply-To, in which case we use From and Reply-To. If
> > this is indeed the least bad
First, I'm aware that such munging is A Bad Thing
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
but a lot of lists do it anyway (mostly to work around widely used
mailers with lame defaults). After munging, we get headers looking like
this
From: Some User
To: Sample users list
On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 20:26:52 +0100, Jed Brown wrote:
> I'm not sure I follow (at least not when comparing to the sanitized
> headers shown in the online archives). Could you send me one of these
> headers?
No problem. See attached.
The mail on cairo-commit has a From: address that is
On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 17:05:06 +0100, Jed Brown wrote:
> First, I'm aware that such munging is A Bad Thing
>
> http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
Definitely.
> From: Some User
> To: Sample users list
> Reply-To: Sample users list
>
> Notmuch reply produces
>
> To:
First, I'm aware that such munging is A Bad Thing
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
but a lot of lists do it anyway (mostly to work around widely used
mailers with lame defaults). After munging, we get headers looking like
this
From: Some User some.u...@example.com
To:
