[notmuch] Mailstore abstraction & maildir synchronization

2010-03-27 Thread Michal Sojka
On Sat, 27 Mar 2010, Michal Sojka wrote: > On Fri, 26 Mar 2010, Michal Sojka wrote: > > On Wed, 24 Mar 2010, Stewart Smith wrote: > > > On Thu, 18 Mar 2010 16:39:36 +0100, Michal Sojka > > > wrote: > > > > - Only file-based storage is suported. Notmuch access the files > > > > directly, and

[notmuch] Mailstore abstraction & maildir synchronization

2010-03-27 Thread Michal Sojka
On Fri, 26 Mar 2010, Michal Sojka wrote: > On Wed, 24 Mar 2010, Stewart Smith wrote: > > On Thu, 18 Mar 2010 16:39:36 +0100, Michal Sojka > > wrote: > > > - Only file-based storage is suported. Notmuch access the files > > > directly, and not via the mailstore interface. > > > > It'll be

[notmuch] Mailstore abstraction & maildir synchronization

2010-03-27 Thread Michal Sojka
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010, Stewart Smith wrote: > On Thu, 18 Mar 2010 16:39:36 +0100, Michal Sojka > wrote: > > - Only file-based storage is suported. Notmuch access the files > > directly, and not via the mailstore interface. > > It'll be great when this is fixed... should be trivial to add a git

Re: [notmuch] Mailstore abstraction maildir synchronization

2010-03-27 Thread Michal Sojka
On Sat, 27 Mar 2010, Michal Sojka wrote: On Fri, 26 Mar 2010, Michal Sojka wrote: On Wed, 24 Mar 2010, Stewart Smith wrote: On Thu, 18 Mar 2010 16:39:36 +0100, Michal Sojka sojk...@fel.cvut.cz wrote: - Only file-based storage is suported. Notmuch access the files directly, and

[notmuch] Mailstore abstraction & maildir synchronization

2010-03-24 Thread Stewart Smith
On Thu, 18 Mar 2010 16:39:36 +0100, Michal Sojka wrote: > - Only file-based storage is suported. Notmuch access the files > directly, and not via the mailstore interface. It'll be great when this is fixed... should be trivial to add a git backend then. (i have in no way been looking at tags

Re: [notmuch] Mailstore abstraction maildir synchronization

2010-03-23 Thread Stewart Smith
On Thu, 18 Mar 2010 16:39:36 +0100, Michal Sojka sojk...@fel.cvut.cz wrote: - Only file-based storage is suported. Notmuch access the files directly, and not via the mailstore interface. It'll be great when this is fixed... should be trivial to add a git backend then. (i have in no way been

[notmuch] Mailstore abstraction & maildir synchronization

2010-03-18 Thread Michal Sojka
Hi all, I've finally found some time to implement the mailstore abstraction was initially described in id:87ljecmnbd.fsf at steelpick.localdomain and id:87eijqlz54.fsf at steelpick.localdomain. The idea is to allow notmuch operate on different types of mail storage (e.g. mail in git

[notmuch] Mailstore abstraction maildir synchronization

2010-03-18 Thread Michal Sojka
Hi all, I've finally found some time to implement the mailstore abstraction was initially described in id:87ljecmnbd@steelpick.localdomain and id:87eijqlz54@steelpick.localdomain. The idea is to allow notmuch operate on different types of mail storage (e.g. mail in git repositories) and