Twas brillig at 18:55:28 27.11.2009 UTC-08 when cworth at cworth.org did gyre
and gimble:
>> Q: Why are my replies five sentences or less?
>> A: http://five.sentenc.es/
CW> There---just five this time. :-)
I imagine hook that counts the number of sentences and inserts proper
signature :)
On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 09:58:00 -0800, Scott Robinson
wrote:
> Excerpts from Jeffrey Ollie's message of Wed Nov 25 09:46:47 -0800 2009:
>
> I selected cJSON because it was simple for integration. Given how libsha1.c is
> included in lib/, I figured adding a depedency wouldn't be very
> popular.
On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 08:16:54 -0800, Scott Robinson
wrote:
> I'm hoping this thread will provide a guide for my efforts.
>
> I'm writing a web frontend for notmuch in Ruby. But, the output from the
> notmuch command-line is ambiguous. Therefore, I've started two branches
> experimenting with
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 11:58 AM, Scott Robinson wrote:
>
> I selected cJSON because it was simple for integration. Given how libsha1.c is
> included in lib/, I figured adding a depedency wouldn't be very popular.
Oh, I noticed libsha1.c as well, and it bugs the heck out of me. I
just haven't
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 11:40 AM, Scott Robinson wrote:
>
> As the json work is a bit more substantial, is it preferable to start a
> [PATCH]
> thread or link to a git repo?
Probably a new [PATCH] thread so that the changes can be discussed.
--
Jeff Ollie
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 10:16 AM, Scott Robinson wrote:
>
> To accomplish this, I used the cJSON library sans parsing logic.
I wasn't familiar with cJSON so I went over to take a look. I haven't
really examined the code, but I really don't like the fact that you
are expected to copy the cJSON
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 10:16 AM, Scott Robinson wrote:
>
> == Shared Library
>
> I have modified the build to output a shared library. It's a small change
> relying on libtool.
>
> However, the archives indicate Carl dislikes libtool?
Ugh, please, let's not go down the autoconf/automake/libtool
Excerpts from Jeffrey Ollie's message of Wed Nov 25 10:03:05 -0800 2009:
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 11:58 AM, Scott Robinson
> wrote:
> > Would it be better to link with a previously existing library?
>
> IMHO yes. I was looking at json-glib because it seems to be the only
> C JSON API in
Excerpts from Jeffrey Ollie's message of Wed Nov 25 09:46:47 -0800 2009:
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 10:16 AM, Scott Robinson
> wrote:
> >
> > To accomplish this, I used the cJSON library sans parsing logic.
>
> I wasn't familiar with cJSON so I went over to take a look. I haven't
> really
Excerpts from Jeffrey Ollie's message of Wed Nov 25 08:33:39 -0800 2009:
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 10:16 AM, Scott Robinson
> wrote:
> >
> > == Shared Library
> >
> > I have modified the build to output a shared library. It's a small change
> > relying on libtool.
> >
> > However, the archives
I'm hoping this thread will provide a guide for my efforts.
I'm writing a web frontend for notmuch in Ruby. But, the output from the
notmuch command-line is ambiguous. Therefore, I've started two branches
experimenting with different ways of providing hooks.
Which of these approaches are likely
11 matches
Mail list logo
