Hi list,
I've spent a few days on porting notmuch.el to vim. It's not as feature
rich as notmuch.el yet, but it's coming along nicely. The results of my
work are here:
git://git.jukie.net/notmuch.git (on the vim branch)
http://git.jukie.net/notmuch.git?a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/vi
Hello.
On Sat, 2009-11-21 at 13:39, Bart Trojanowski wrote:
>
> I've spent a few days on porting notmuch.el to vim. It's not as feature
> rich as notmuch.el yet, but it's coming along nicely. The results of my
> work are here:
Great stuff! I hoped for someone stepping up early to provide alter
* Stefan Schmidt [091121 14:06]:
> IMHO it would be best to do the development inside the main tree. You could
> use
> branches there too and it would be easier to find and test. And as notmuch is
> still under heavy development its not a problem that the vim interface is as
> well.
Perfect. Ho
Hello.
[Resend, first one missed the list]
On Sat, 2009-11-21 at 14:14, Bart Trojanowski wrote:
> * Stefan Schmidt [091121 14:06]:
> > IMHO it would be best to do the development inside the main tree. You could
> > use
> > branches there too and it would be easier to find and test. And as notmu
On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 13:39:09 -0500, Bart Trojanowski wrote:
> I've spent a few days on porting notmuch.el to vim. It's not as feature
> rich as notmuch.el yet, but it's coming along nicely. The results of my
> work are here:
Oh, hey! That's fantastic. I didn't expect to see a second notmuch
int
On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 14:14:02 -0500, Bart Trojanowski wrote:
> Perfect. How would you like to proceed with the initial integration?
> Pulling my tree, or me squashing all the changes into a single patch?
> Also, are you OK with where the files live (ie under a vim directory).
I'm glad to pull (it
* Carl Worth [091121 15:14]:
> So, well done!
Thank you.
> I think the only thing we noticed is that "filter" doesn't add the "and"
> between the old and new search terms. But Chris may have more to comment
> soon.
I think I fixed that along the way. I'll verify.
> I don't know how realistic
* Carl Worth [091121 15:20]:
> On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 14:14:02 -0500, Bart Trojanowski
> wrote:
> > Perfect. How would you like to proceed with the initial integration?
> > Pulling my tree, or me squashing all the changes into a single patch?
> > Also, are you OK with where the files live (ie unde
