Mark Walters writes:
>
> I have looked at this and I think this is not notmuch's fault: I think
> it is a mua doing strange things:
>
> One of the mails has an in-reply-to header which looks like
>
> In-reply-to: Message from Carsten Dominik
Gregor Zattler writes:
>
> With mutt I had a view at the collapsed 7 respective 34 threads.
> One then sees the very first E-Mails of a thread and among other
> information their subjects.
> Via editing I produced two lists with subjects and then searched
> each of the 7 in the list with the 34.
Gregor Zattler telegr...@gmx.net writes:
With mutt I had a view at the collapsed 7 respective 34 threads.
One then sees the very first E-Mails of a thread and among other
information their subjects.
Via editing I produced two lists with subjects and then searched
each of the 7 in the list
On Sun, 26 Jan 2014 22:26:04 +0100, Gregor Zattler wrote:
> Hi David,
> * David Bremner [24. Jan. 2014]:
> > Mark Walters writes:
> >> I have looked at this and I think this is not notmuch's fault: I think
> >> it is a mua doing strange things:
> >>
> >> One of the mails has an in-reply-to
Hi David,
* David Bremner [26. Jan. 2014]:
> Gregor Zattler writes:
>
>> Today I produced another mbox with the very same command but with
>> a now larger email corpus freshly indexed with a fresh notmuch.
>> The mbox contains (according to mutt) 507 messages in 34 threads.
>> One of them is
On Sun, 26 Jan 2014 22:26:04 +0100, Gregor Zattler telegr...@gmx.net wrote:
Hi David,
* David Bremner da...@tethera.net [24. Jan. 2014]:
Mark Walters markwalters1...@gmail.com writes:
I have looked at this and I think this is not notmuch's fault: I think
it is a mua doing strange things:
Hi David,
* David Bremner [24. Jan. 2014]:
> Mark Walters writes:
>> I have looked at this and I think this is not notmuch's fault: I think
>> it is a mua doing strange things:
>>
>> One of the mails has an in-reply-to header which looks like
>>
>> In-reply-to: Message from Carsten Dominik of
Gregor Zattler writes:
> Today I produced another mbox with the very same command but with
> a now larger email corpus freshly indexed with a fresh notmuch.
> The mbox contains (according to mutt) 507 messages in 34 threads.
> One of them is the thread I searched for.
>
> I grepped for the 7
Hi David,
* David Bremner da...@tethera.net [24. Jan. 2014]:
Mark Walters markwalters1...@gmail.com writes:
I have looked at this and I think this is not notmuch's fault: I think
it is a mua doing strange things:
One of the mails has an in-reply-to header which looks like
In-reply-to:
Gregor Zattler telegr...@gmx.net writes:
Today I produced another mbox with the very same command but with
a now larger email corpus freshly indexed with a fresh notmuch.
The mbox contains (according to mutt) 507 messages in 34 threads.
One of them is the thread I searched for.
I grepped
Hi David,
* David Bremner da...@tethera.net [26. Jan. 2014]:
Gregor Zattler telegr...@gmx.net writes:
Today I produced another mbox with the very same command but with
a now larger email corpus freshly indexed with a fresh notmuch.
The mbox contains (according to mutt) 507 messages in 34
Mark Walters writes:
> Hi
>
> I have looked at this and I think this is not notmuch's fault: I think
> it is a mua doing strange things:
>
> One of the mails has an in-reply-to header which looks like
>
> In-reply-to: Message from Carsten Dominik of
> "Tue, 15 Mar 2011 12:18:51 BST."
Mark Walters markwalters1...@gmail.com writes:
Hi
I have looked at this and I think this is not notmuch's fault: I think
it is a mua doing strange things:
One of the mails has an in-reply-to header which looks like
In-reply-to: Message from Carsten Dominik carsten.domi...@gmail.com of
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 23:34:16 +0100, Gregor Zattler wrote:
> Hi Mark,
> * Mark Walters [30. Jan. 2012]:
> > On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 20:04:25 +0100, Gregor Zattler
> > wrote:
> >> * Pieter Praet [30. Jan. 2012]:
> >>> On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 00:42:14 +0100, Gregor Zattler
> >>> wrote:
> * Pieter
On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 01:18:55 +, Mark Walters markwalters1...@gmail.com
wrote:
One of the mails has an in-reply-to header which looks like
In-reply-to: Message from Carsten Dominik carsten.domi...@gmail.com of
Tue, 15 Mar 2011 12:18:51 BST.
Hi Mark,
* Mark Walters [30. Jan. 2012]:
> On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 20:04:25 +0100, Gregor Zattler
> wrote:
>> * Pieter Praet [30. Jan. 2012]:
>>> On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 00:42:14 +0100, Gregor Zattler
>>> wrote:
* Pieter Praet [26. Jan. 2012]:
> Here's another couple of threads squashed
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 20:04:25 +0100, Gregor Zattler wrote:
> Hi Pieter,
> * Pieter Praet [30. Jan. 2012]:
> > On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 00:42:14 +0100, Gregor Zattler
> > wrote:
> >> * Pieter Praet [26. Jan. 2012]:
> >>> On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 13:44:50 +0100, Gregor Zattler
> >>> wrote:
> |>
Hi Pieter,
* Pieter Praet [30. Jan. 2012]:
> On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 00:42:14 +0100, Gregor Zattler
> wrote:
>> * Pieter Praet [26. Jan. 2012]:
>>> On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 13:44:50 +0100, Gregor Zattler
>>> wrote:
|> [2] grep -I "^Message-Id:" /tmp/thread-I-m-interested-in.mbox |sed
-e
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 00:42:14 +0100, Gregor Zattler wrote:
> Hi Pieter, notmuch developers
> * Pieter Praet [26. Jan. 2012]:
> > On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 13:44:50 +0100, Gregor Zattler
> > wrote:
> >>|> [2] grep -I "^Message-Id:" /tmp/thread-I-m-interested-in.mbox |sed
> >> -e "s/Message-Id:
Hi Pieter, notmuch developers
* Pieter Praet [26. Jan. 2012]:
> On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 13:44:50 +0100, Gregor Zattler
> wrote:
>>|> [2] grep -I "^Message-Id:" /tmp/thread-I-m-interested-in.mbox |sed -e
>> "s/Message-Id: $//" >really.mid
>>|> grep -I -F really.mid rest.mbox
>>|>
Hi Jani, notmuch developers,
executive summary: notmuch almangamates several e-mail threads
into one notmuch-thread, I consider this a bug:
* Jani Nikula [26. Jan. 2012]:
> On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 13:44:50 +0100, Gregor Zattler
> wrote:
>> * Jameson Graef Rollins [25. Jan. 2012]:
>>> On Wed, 25
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 20:04:25 +0100, Gregor Zattler telegr...@gmx.net wrote:
Hi Pieter,
* Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org [30. Jan. 2012]:
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 00:42:14 +0100, Gregor Zattler telegr...@gmx.net
wrote:
* Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org [26. Jan. 2012]:
On Thu, 26 Jan 2012
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 23:34:16 +0100, Gregor Zattler telegr...@gmx.net wrote:
Hi Mark,
* Mark Walters markwalters1...@gmail.com [30. Jan. 2012]:
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 20:04:25 +0100, Gregor Zattler telegr...@gmx.net
wrote:
* Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org [30. Jan. 2012]:
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012
Hi Jani, notmuch developers,
executive summary: notmuch almangamates several e-mail threads
into one notmuch-thread, I consider this a bug:
* Jani Nikula j...@nikula.org [26. Jan. 2012]:
On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 13:44:50 +0100, Gregor Zattler telegr...@gmx.net wrote:
* Jameson Graef Rollins
On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 13:44:50 +0100, Gregor Zattler wrote:
> Hi Jamie, Austin,
> * Jameson Graef Rollins [25. Jan. 2012]:
> > On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 20:19:03 -0500, Austin Clements
> > wrote:
> >> One very common cause of this is someone using "reply" to get an
> >> initial set of recipients, but
Hi Jamie, Austin,
* Jameson Graef Rollins [25. Jan. 2012]:
> On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 20:19:03 -0500, Austin Clements
> wrote:
>> One very common cause of this is someone using "reply" to get an
>> initial set of recipients, but then replacing the entire message and
>> subject (presumably without
On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 13:44:50 +0100, Gregor Zattler wrote:
> Hi Jamie, Austin,
> * Jameson Graef Rollins [25. Jan. 2012]:
> > On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 20:19:03 -0500, Austin Clements
> > wrote:
> >> One very common cause of this is someone using "reply" to get an
> >> initial set of recipients, but
[sorry for the long and meandering explanation, I do not know how
to express the issue more concise]
Dear notmuch developers,
may someone please enlighten me regarding this behaviour:
I experienced a situation where the Emacs interface shows three
(3) different threads in one notmuch show
Hi Jamie, Austin,
* Jameson Graef Rollins jroll...@finestructure.net [25. Jan. 2012]:
On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 20:19:03 -0500, Austin Clements amdra...@mit.edu wrote:
One very common cause of this is someone using reply to get an
initial set of recipients, but then replacing the entire message and
On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 13:44:50 +0100, Gregor Zattler telegr...@gmx.net wrote:
Hi Jamie, Austin,
* Jameson Graef Rollins jroll...@finestructure.net [25. Jan. 2012]:
On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 20:19:03 -0500, Austin Clements amdra...@mit.edu
wrote:
One very common cause of this is someone using
On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 13:44:50 +0100, Gregor Zattler telegr...@gmx.net wrote:
Hi Jamie, Austin,
* Jameson Graef Rollins jroll...@finestructure.net [25. Jan. 2012]:
On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 20:19:03 -0500, Austin Clements amdra...@mit.edu
wrote:
One very common cause of this is someone using
Quoth Gregor Zattler on Jan 26 at 1:40 am:
> [sorry for the long and meandering explanation, I do not know how
> to express the issue more concise]
>
> Dear notmuch developers,
>
> may someone please enlighten me regarding this behaviour:
>
> I experienced a situation where the Emacs
On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 20:19:03 -0500, Austin Clements wrote:
> One very common cause of this is someone using "reply" to get an
> initial set of recipients, but then replacing the entire message and
> subject (presumably without realizing that the mail is still tracking
> what it was a reply to).
[sorry for the long and meandering explanation, I do not know how
to express the issue more concise]
Dear notmuch developers,
may someone please enlighten me regarding this behaviour:
I experienced a situation where the Emacs interface shows three
(3) different threads in one notmuch show
Quoth Gregor Zattler on Jan 26 at 1:40 am:
[sorry for the long and meandering explanation, I do not know how
to express the issue more concise]
Dear notmuch developers,
may someone please enlighten me regarding this behaviour:
I experienced a situation where the Emacs interface shows
On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 20:19:03 -0500, Austin Clements amdra...@mit.edu wrote:
One very common cause of this is someone using reply to get an
initial set of recipients, but then replacing the entire message and
subject (presumably without realizing that the mail is still tracking
what it was a
36 matches
Mail list logo