Improved search speed by 2.5X

2010-11-16 Thread David Edmondson
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 11:18:43 -0500, Austin Clements wrote: > [1] Except for 2 emacs tests that depend on author order. What order > are matched authors *supposed* to be in? In IRC cworth confirmed that he considered the current behaviour a bug, which is to say that the authors should be sorted b

Improved search speed by 2.5X

2010-11-16 Thread Austin Clements
Quoth David Edmondson on Nov 16 at 4:58 pm: > On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 11:18:43 -0500, Austin Clements > wrote: > > [1] Except for 2 emacs tests that depend on author order. What order > > are matched authors *supposed* to be in? > > In IRC cworth confirmed that he considered the current behaviour

Improved search speed by 2.5X

2010-11-16 Thread Austin Clements
'Lo. I've been toying with switching to notmuch for a while, but the speed of search has been holding me back. Perhaps I should upgrade the archaic machine I'm trying to run notmuch on, but I figured optimizing search would be a good way for me to cut my teeth on notmuch's code. I've implemented

Re: Improved search speed by 2.5X

2010-11-16 Thread Carl Worth
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 11:18:43 -0500, Austin Clements wrote: > 'Lo. I've been toying with switching to notmuch for a while, but the > speed of search has been holding me back. Perhaps I should upgrade > the archaic machine I'm trying to run notmuch on, but I figured > optimizing search would be a

Improved search speed by 2.5X

2010-11-16 Thread Carl Worth
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 11:18:43 -0500, Austin Clements wrote: > 'Lo. I've been toying with switching to notmuch for a while, but the > speed of search has been holding me back. Perhaps I should upgrade > the archaic machine I'm trying to run notmuch on, but I figured > optimizing search would be a

Re: Improved search speed by 2.5X

2010-11-16 Thread Austin Clements
Quoth David Edmondson on Nov 16 at 4:58 pm: > On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 11:18:43 -0500, Austin Clements wrote: > > [1] Except for 2 emacs tests that depend on author order. What order > > are matched authors *supposed* to be in? > > In IRC cworth confirmed that he considered the current behaviour a b

Re: Improved search speed by 2.5X

2010-11-16 Thread David Edmondson
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 11:18:43 -0500, Austin Clements wrote: > [1] Except for 2 emacs tests that depend on author order. What order > are matched authors *supposed* to be in? In IRC cworth confirmed that he considered the current behaviour a bug, which is to say that the authors should be sorted b

Improved search speed by 2.5X

2010-11-16 Thread Austin Clements
'Lo. I've been toying with switching to notmuch for a while, but the speed of search has been holding me back. Perhaps I should upgrade the archaic machine I'm trying to run notmuch on, but I figured optimizing search would be a good way for me to cut my teeth on notmuch's code. I've implemented