Re: Protected Headers (2nd major revision, more testing!)

2019-05-29 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On Wed 2019-05-29 08:44:00 -0300, David Bremner wrote: > It's in. Thanks! > I did bodge things up slightly due to the threading of patch 14, but I > added the trivial patch with the one line change I missed. that's not a bodge at all compared to the several different bodges i did on that

Re: Protected Headers (2nd major revision, more testing!)

2019-05-29 Thread David Bremner
Daniel Kahn Gillmor writes: > Hi all-- > > Way back in id:20180511055544.13676-1-...@fifthhorseman.net, i > proposed support for protected headers (in particular, for being able > to read and search for subject lines of encrypted messages which > protect the Subject). Although that series was

Re: Protected Headers (2nd major revision, more testing!)

2019-05-27 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On Sun 2019-05-26 18:15:53 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > this series delivers a concrete improvement: users of notmuch can now > read, index, and search for the subject lines of encrypted messages > sent from MUAs like Enigmail and K-9 mail. Many thanks to jrollins and bremner for their

Re: Protected Headers (2nd major revision, more testing!)

2019-05-27 Thread Rollins, Jameson
On Sun, May 26 2019, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > Way back in id:20180511055544.13676-1-...@fifthhorseman.net, i > proposed support for protected headers (in particular, for being able > to read and search for subject lines of encrypted messages which > protect the Subject). Although that series

Protected Headers (2nd major revision, more testing!)

2019-05-26 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
Hi all-- Way back in id:20180511055544.13676-1-...@fifthhorseman.net, i proposed support for protected headers (in particular, for being able to read and search for subject lines of encrypted messages which protect the Subject). Although that series was reviewed by Bremner, i never managed to