Hello.
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 12:21:20 +, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 15:39:14 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
> wrote:
> > On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 11:35:37 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> > > On Sun, 25 Dec 2011 08:14:52 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
> > > wrote:
> > > > Before the change, ther
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 15:39:14 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 11:35:37 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> > On Sun, 25 Dec 2011 08:14:52 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
> > wrote:
> > > Before the change, there were two ways to do search in Emacs UI:
> > > search widget in notmuch-hel
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 15:39:14 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
wrote:
> > Dmitry, if Daniel re-submits his patches to allow the construction of
> > `notmuch-hello' buffers to be configured, it seems that this patchset
> > would become unnecessary. Is that correct?
>
> Right. We will just need to fix the
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 11:35:37 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Dec 2011 08:14:52 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
> wrote:
> > Before the change, there were two ways to do search in Emacs UI:
> > search widget in notmuch-hello buffer and `notmuch-search'
> > function bound to "s". Internally, n
On Sun, 25 Dec 2011 08:14:52 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
wrote:
> Before the change, there were two ways to do search in Emacs UI:
> search widget in notmuch-hello buffer and `notmuch-search'
> function bound to "s". Internally, notmuch-hello search widget
> uses `notmuch-search' function. But it u
On Mon, 02 Jan 2012 15:23:17 +0200, Tomi Ollila wrote:
> On Sat, 31 Dec 2011 14:42:47 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > On Fri, 30 Dec 2011 10:43:37 -0400, David Bremner wrote:
> >
> > > Personally I would like to be able to customize the hello screen to
> > > remove the search box. I find it confu
On Sat, 31 Dec 2011 14:42:47 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Dec 2011 10:43:37 -0400, David Bremner wrote:
>
> > Personally I would like to be able to customize the hello screen to
> > remove the search box. I find it confusing that that 's' jumps to the
> > search box there, and everywhe
On Sat, 31 Dec 2011 14:42:47 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> Would it be a suitable compromise to bind 's' to notmuch-search (the
> mini-buffer search) also in notmuch-hello, while leaving the search
> box there with a common history?
>
> I'm not sure moving the point to search box needs a keybinding
On Sat, 31 Dec 2011 14:42:47 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> Would it be a suitable compromise to bind 's' to notmuch-search (the
> mini-buffer search) also in notmuch-hello, while leaving the search box
> there with a common history?
That would be fine for me. But other people might find it weird I
On Fri, 30 Dec 2011 10:43:37 -0400, David Bremner wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Dec 2011 10:44:28 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> > On Sun, 25 Dec 2011 08:14:52 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
> >
> > Were there actual complaints about the usability of the current
> > approach?
> >
> > I much preferred your al
On Fri, 30 Dec 2011 10:43:37 -0400, David Bremner wrote:
> Personally I would like to be able to customize the hello screen to
> remove the search box. I find it confusing that that 's' jumps to the
> search box there, and everywhere else brings up the mini-buffer.
+1. I rarely use notmuch-hello
On Fri, 30 Dec 2011 10:43:37 -0400, David Bremner wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Dec 2011 10:44:28 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> > On Sun, 25 Dec 2011 08:14:52 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
> >
> > Were there actual complaints about the usability of the current
> > approach?
> >
> > I much preferred your al
On Fri, 30 Dec 2011 10:44:28 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Dec 2011 08:14:52 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
>
> Were there actual complaints about the usability of the current
> approach?
>
> I much preferred your alternative approach (merging the history while
> leaving the UI alone).
On Sun, 25 Dec 2011 08:14:52 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
wrote:
> Before the change, there were two ways to do search in Emacs UI:
> search widget in notmuch-hello buffer and `notmuch-search' function
> bound to "s". Internally, notmuch-hello search widget uses
> `notmuch-search' function. But it u
14 matches
Mail list logo