Re: [notmuch] A functional (but rudimentary) test suite for notmuch

2010-02-12 Thread Carl Worth
On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 15:47:56 +0100, Michal Sojka wrote: > I'm not lawyer, but I'd say it should be no problem to use GPLv2 test > suite to test your GPLv3 application. You are not linking them > together. Right. We could do that. But we'd have to be careful to document things carefully to keep tr

Re: [notmuch] A functional (but rudimentary) test suite for notmuch

2010-02-12 Thread Michal Sojka
On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 13:42:08 -0800, Carl Worth wrote: > Interesting. My only real concern at this point is that some of the new files > have a copyright header identifying Junio as the copyright holder, but > no license information. Meanwhile, the implicit license of git (GPLv2 > only) is incompat

Re: [notmuch] A functional (but rudimentary) test suite for notmuch

2010-02-11 Thread Carl Worth
Hi Michal, I found myself today *really* needing to add a test that exercises some code in our emacs client. (Eric found that a message that includes a ":" in the From: address breaks things due to a buggy regexp.) And I wanted to see if I could merge your conversion of the test suite before I add

Re: [notmuch] A functional (but rudimentary) test suite for notmuch

2010-02-08 Thread Michal Sojka
On Thursday 04 of February 2010 21:50:18 Carl Worth wrote: > The test suite is still extremely rudimentary. Here are some things I'd > like to improve about it: I converted the actual version of notmuch-test to git test framework. The result is in the followup patches. I'd like to know opinion of

Re: [notmuch] A functional (but rudimentary) test suite for notmuch

2010-02-06 Thread Oliver Charles
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 11:29 PM, Carl Worth wrote: > Looking at TAP, one thing I don't like is that it prints the > success/failure of the test first, before the description of the > test. That's not so nice in the case of a long-running (perhaps > infinitely running) test where you might need to

Re: [notmuch] A functional (but rudimentary) test suite for notmuch

2010-02-04 Thread Carl Worth
On Thu, 4 Feb 2010 21:27:52 +, Oliver Charles wrote: > Carl, have you considered outputting the test suite in the same format > as the test anything protocol? [1] I only mention this because it > might be a nice way to easily do some reporting (or perhaps even > continuous integration) notmuc

Re: [notmuch] A functional (but rudimentary) test suite for notmuch

2010-02-04 Thread Oliver Charles
Carl, have you considered outputting the test suite in the same format as the test anything protocol? [1] I only mention this because it might be a nice way to easily do some reporting (or perhaps even continuous integration) notmuch, with trivial effort. -- Oliver Charles / aCiD2 [1]: http: