On Thu, 03 Jun 2010 19:20:54 -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
> > [PATCH 09/13] emacs: Avoid runtime use of `cl'.
>
> Perhaps it's just fine now that you've been testing it a while, but at
> least in your original email you said you wanted some additional review,
> so I planned to do that.
I have not no
On Thu, 03 Jun 2010 19:20:54 -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
> > [PATCH 09/13] emacs: Avoid runtime use of `cl'.
>
> Perhaps it's just fine now that you've been testing it a while, but at
> least in your original email you said you wanted some additional review,
> so I planned to do that.
I have not no
On Wed, 19 May 2010 08:03:27 +0100, David Edmondson wrote:
> This is a set of small feature and cleanup patches. The only
> particularly significant one is patch 2, as it fixes a memory
> corruption bug in notmuch.
Thanks, David.
Most of these I had already picked up in my recent scan of my
queu
On Wed, 19 May 2010 08:03:27 +0100, David Edmondson wrote:
> This is a set of small feature and cleanup patches. The only
> particularly significant one is patch 2, as it fixes a memory
> corruption bug in notmuch.
Thanks, David.
Most of these I had already picked up in my recent scan of my
queu
This is a set of small feature and cleanup patches. The only
particularly significant one is patch 2, as it fixes a memory
corruption bug in notmuch.
dme.
[PATCH 01/13] emacs: Usability improvements for `notmuch-hello'.
[PATCH 02/13] notmuch: Fix off-by-one errors if a header is >200 characters
This is a set of small feature and cleanup patches. The only
particularly significant one is patch 2, as it fixes a memory
corruption bug in notmuch.
dme.
[PATCH 01/13] emacs: Usability improvements for `notmuch-hello'.
[PATCH 02/13] notmuch: Fix off-by-one errors if a header is >200 characters
