On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 22:36:06 +, Patrick Totzke wrote:
> These are the things I noticed when going through the code today:
> 1) in filenames.py, __str__ of Filenames: should the return value be
>'\n'.join(self._files)? alternatively, define __iter__ to make this object
>behave as iterat
On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 22:36:06 +, Patrick Totzke wrote:
> These are the things I noticed when going through the code today:
> 1) in filenames.py, __str__ of Filenames: should the return value be
>'\n'.join(self._files)? alternatively, define __iter__ to make this object
>behave as iterat
Hi!
This is mainly directed towards Sebastian, but a broader audience can't hurt.
These are the things I noticed when going through the code today:
1) in filenames.py, __str__ of Filenames: should the return value be
'\n'.join(self._files)? alternatively, define __iter__ to make this object
Hi!
This is mainly directed towards Sebastian, but a broader audience can't hurt.
These are the things I noticed when going through the code today:
1) in filenames.py, __str__ of Filenames: should the return value be
'\n'.join(self._files)? alternatively, define __iter__ to make this object
On Mon, 18 Apr 2011 17:03:01 +0200, Florian Friesdorf
wrote:
> Is it sane to have python bindings that need updates or would a plain
> wrapper of the notmuch script (that maybe needs less updates) be better?
> I don't want to imply that this can be answered with yes/no, but more to
> get a compar
On 04/19/2011 04:01 PM, Sebastian Spaeth wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Apr 2011 17:03:01 +0200, Florian Friesdorf
> wrote:
>> Is it sane to have python bindings that need updates or would a plain
>> wrapper of the notmuch script (that maybe needs less updates) be better?
>> I don't want to imply that this
On 04/19/2011 04:01 PM, Sebastian Spaeth wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Apr 2011 17:03:01 +0200, Florian Friesdorf
> wrote:
>> Is it sane to have python bindings that need updates or would a plain
>> wrapper of the notmuch script (that maybe needs less updates) be better?
>> I don't want to imply that this
On Mon, 18 Apr 2011 17:03:01 +0200, Florian Friesdorf wrote:
> Is it sane to have python bindings that need updates or would a plain
> wrapper of the notmuch script (that maybe needs less updates) be better?
> I don't want to imply that this can be answered with yes/no, but more to
> get a compari
On Mon, 18 Apr 2011 15:57:26 +0200, Sebastian Spaeth
wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Apr 2011 14:32:16 +0200, Florian Friesdorf
> wrote:
> > I think it is confusing that it has a different versioning than notmuch
> > itself and that it would be more intuitive if the current bindings on
> > pypi [1] would h
On Mon, 18 Apr 2011 14:32:16 +0200, Florian Friesdorf
wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Mar 2011 16:16:15 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth SSpaeth.de> wrote:
> > > http://packages.python.org/notmuch/
> I updated http://notmuchmail.org/howto/ to point to notmuch instead of
> cnotmuch, but I cannot tell whether the exa
On Tue, 15 Mar 2011 16:16:15 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth
wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Mar 2011 23:26:29 -0700, Jameson Rollins wrote:
> > I just discovered this:
> >
> > http://packages.python.org/notmuch/
> >
> > I don't know who did this, but THANK YOU!! I want to buy you a beer.
>
> I prefer the strong
On Mon, 18 Apr 2011 15:57:26 +0200, Sebastian Spaeth
wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Apr 2011 14:32:16 +0200, Florian Friesdorf
> wrote:
> > I think it is confusing that it has a different versioning than notmuch
> > itself and that it would be more intuitive if the current bindings on
> > pypi [1] would h
On Mon, 18 Apr 2011 14:32:16 +0200, Florian Friesdorf wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Mar 2011 16:16:15 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth
> wrote:
> > > http://packages.python.org/notmuch/
> I updated http://notmuchmail.org/howto/ to point to notmuch instead of
> cnotmuch, but I cannot tell whether the example there
On Tue, 15 Mar 2011 16:16:15 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth
wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Mar 2011 23:26:29 -0700, Jameson Rollins wrote:
> > I just discovered this:
> >
> > http://packages.python.org/notmuch/
> >
> > I don't know who did this, but THANK YOU!! I want to buy you a beer.
>
> I prefer the strong
On Tue, 15 Mar 2011 15:01:15 -0400, James Vasile
wrote:
> Yep, just a completed TODO. Patch below.
Fixed and pushed. Thanks.
Sebastian
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not ava
On Tue, 15 Mar 2011 15:01:15 -0400, James Vasile
wrote:
> Yep, just a completed TODO. Patch below.
Fixed and pushed. Thanks.
Sebastian
pgpNYkRfIXRj1.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
http://notmuchmail.
On Mon, 14 Mar 2011 23:26:29 -0700, Jameson Rollins wrote:
> I just discovered this:
>
> http://packages.python.org/notmuch/
>
> I don't know who did this, but THANK YOU!! I want to buy you a beer.
I prefer the stronger type of beer. But I'll even take Budweiser :-).
Please ship in August to S
On Tue, 15 Mar 2011 11:33:19 -0700, Jameson Rollins wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Mar 2011 14:22:55 -0400, James Vasile
> wrote:
> > notmuch dump includes '# TODO: implement "dump "' but it
> > appears to work already. What's missing?
>
> Hey, James. Is
notmuch dump includes '# TODO: implement "dump "' but it
appears to work already. What's missing?
Thanks,
James
On Tue, 15 Mar 2011 11:33:19 -0700, Jameson Rollins
wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Mar 2011 14:22:55 -0400, James Vasile
> wrote:
> > notmuch dump includes '# TODO: implement "dump "' but it
> > appears to work already. What's missing?
>
> Hey, Ja
On Tue, 15 Mar 2011 14:22:55 -0400, James Vasile
wrote:
> notmuch dump includes '# TODO: implement "dump "' but it
> appears to work already. What's missing?
Hey, James. Is this related to the python documentation somehow? If
so, I'm not sure how.
If you&
On Tue, 15 Mar 2011 14:22:55 -0400, James Vasile
wrote:
> notmuch dump includes '# TODO: implement "dump "' but it
> appears to work already. What's missing?
Hey, James. Is this related to the python documentation somehow? If
so, I'm not sure how.
If you&
notmuch dump includes '# TODO: implement "dump "' but it
appears to work already. What's missing?
Thanks,
James
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
On Mon, 14 Mar 2011 23:26:29 -0700, Jameson Rollins wrote:
> I just discovered this:
>
> http://packages.python.org/notmuch/
>
> I don't know who did this, but THANK YOU!! I want to buy you a beer.
I prefer the stronger type of beer. But I'll even take Budweiser :-).
Please ship in August to S
I just discovered this:
http://packages.python.org/notmuch/
I don't know who did this, but THANK YOU!! I want to buy you a beer.
jamie.
pgpig71Wo3F0x.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
http://notmuchmail.
I just discovered this:
http://packages.python.org/notmuch/
I don't know who did this, but THANK YOU!! I want to buy you a beer.
jamie.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not ava
26 matches
Mail list logo
