On Tue 2019-04-23 22:09:23 -0300, David Bremner wrote:
> [dkg wrote:]
>> I do note that (independent of this series), if i run the following
>> loop:
>>
>>
>> while make -j4 --trace; do
>> python3 -c 'print("="*100)'
>> touch doc/man1/notmuch-reply.rst
>> done
>>
>> then
Daniel Kahn Gillmor writes:
> On Mon 2019-04-22 21:03:05 -0300, David Bremner wrote:
>> There was a problem with the first patch, which I replaced with two more.
>
> thanks. i've reviewed and published my review on that series. I think
> it should probably be merged.
>
>> I'm open to ideas,
On Mon 2019-04-22 21:03:05 -0300, David Bremner wrote:
> There was a problem with the first patch, which I replaced with two more.
thanks. i've reviewed and published my review on that series. I think
it should probably be merged.
> I'm open to ideas, but keep in mind we want to support
Daniel Kahn Gillmor writes:
> On Sun 2019-04-21 16:29:02 -0300, David Bremner wrote:
>> the html rebuild is much faster than the texinfo + info rebuilds.
>
> agreed, in the runs that i've been doing as well. I was concerned that
> the html rebuild itself may have been *triggering* the rebuild
On Sun 2019-04-21 16:29:02 -0300, David Bremner wrote:
> the html rebuild is much faster than the texinfo + info rebuilds.
agreed, in the runs that i've been doing as well. I was concerned that
the html rebuild itself may have been *triggering* the rebuild of the
texinfo stuff, though. Sounds
Daniel Kahn Gillmor writes:
> but it's not just texinfo, right? it starts with the html build
> itself. can we at least diagnose why that's happening?
>
Yes, although the html rebuild is much faster than the texinfo + info rebuilds.
>> This Makefile is generated by "ruby extconf.rb
thanks for the review, Bremner!
On Sat 2019-04-20 21:12:07 -0300, David Bremner wrote:
> Daniel Kahn Gillmor writes:
>> 0 dkg@alice:~/src/notmuch/notmuch$ ./configure && make
>> […]
>> make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/dkg/src/notmuch/notmuch/bindings/ruby'
>> 0 dkg@alice:~/src/notmuch/notmuch$
Daniel Kahn Gillmor writes:
> Hi folks--
>
> when i run "make" from my source tree, and it succeeds, i typically
> expect that running "make" again will show that nothing needs to be
> done.
>
> but that's not the case. Both the sphinx-based documentation and the
> ruby notmuch.so are always
Hi folks--
when i run "make" from my source tree, and it succeeds, i typically
expect that running "make" again will show that nothing needs to be
done.
but that's not the case. Both the sphinx-based documentation and the
ruby notmuch.so are always rebuilt, i think due to some sort of
