On Wed 02 Nov 2011 04:37:05 PM EET, Austin Clements wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 7:07 PM, Florian Friesdorf
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm looking into taking the References header into account for thread
> > ordering. So far only In-Reply-To is used. My C/C++ is rusty at best, so
On Wed 02 Nov 2011 04:37:05 PM EET, Austin Clements wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 7:07 PM, Florian Friesdorf wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm looking into taking the References header into account for thread
> > ordering. So far only In-Reply-To is used. My C/C++ is rusty at best, so
>
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 7:07 PM, Florian Friesdorf wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm looking into taking the References header into account for thread
> ordering. So far only In-Reply-To is used. My C/C++ is rusty at best, so
> I'd need some help to get this done.
>
> Carl gave a try on irc already to clear
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 7:07 PM, Florian Friesdorf wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm looking into taking the References header into account for thread
> ordering. So far only In-Reply-To is used. My C/C++ is rusty at best, so
> I'd need some help to get this done.
>
> Carl gave a try on irc already to clear
Hi,
I'm looking into taking the References header into account for thread
ordering. So far only In-Reply-To is used. My C/C++ is rusty at best, so
I'd need some help to get this done.
Carl gave a try on irc already to clear things up for me, reading into
it, I have more questions:
lib/thread.cc
Hi,
I'm looking into taking the References header into account for thread
ordering. So far only In-Reply-To is used. My C/C++ is rusty at best, so
I'd need some help to get this done.
Carl gave a try on irc already to clear things up for me, reading into
it, I have more questions:
lib/thread.cc