Hi,
On 27-07-15 17:52, Hans de Goede wrote:
Slightly offtopic:
I decided to be bold and try gnome-shell on the nv46 with msi disabled,
which sofar was a guaranteed way to freeze the system, and it now works
somewhat (latest kernel, ddx and mesa). I see something which shows
horizontal lines wh
Hi Maarten,
xf86-video-nouveau causes a garbled display when running
gnome-shell on nv4x (tested with nv43 and nv46) since this commit:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/nouveau/xf86-video-nouveau/commit/?id=241e7289f25a342a457952b9b0e539c2f0b81d99
I've seen some discussion about issues caused by ena
FWIW this is a fail on nv50+ as well. See for example
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91445
My suspicion is that this is due to the lack of PUSH_KICK in the *Done
exa handlers -- works fine with DRI2, but DRI3 has no synchronization
and so the commands never get flushed out. Easily ve
On 29 July 2015 at 13:39, Mario Kleiner wrote:
> Allow user to select the maximum level of DRI implementation
> to use, DRI2 or DRI3.
>
> exa accel supports both DRI2 and, if the kernel supports
> rendernodes, also DRI3. However, DRI3 still seems to have
> some bugs on current implementations, and
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91373
--- Comment #9 from Olivier Diotte ---
After a week's worth of usage on kernel 3.13.0, I'm confident enough to assert
that that kernel version is usable.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91413
--- Comment #3 from Olivier Diotte ---
This doesn't happen on 3.13.0
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Nouveau mailing list
Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
ht
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71900
--- Comment #10 from Brock Wittrock ---
>From what I was reading, Ben's patches weren't necessarily ideal for final
inclusion into the driver. Still trying to wrap my head around the comments
from that thread in the mailing list archives to see
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71900
--- Comment #11 from Ben Skeggs ---
(In reply to Brock Wittrock from comment #10)
> From what I was reading, Ben's patches weren't necessarily ideal for final
> inclusion into the driver. Still trying to wrap my head around the comments
> from t
