[Nouveau] [Bug 91738] [NV117] NULL deref in nvkm_i2c_try_acquire_pad, kernel 4.1

2015-08-24 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91738 Ilia Mirkin changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #117904|text/plain |application/octet-stream mime typ

Re: [Nouveau] [PATCH 0/2] drm/nouveau: add support for 2560x1440@56 over HDMI

2015-08-24 Thread Ben Skeggs
On 18 August 2015 at 04:04, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: > On 08/08/2015 07:01 PM, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: >> These patches are adding support for outputting 2560x1440@56 over HDMI. >> This needs a pixel clock of 225 MHz which was not supported before. >> >> This was tested in a dual monitor setup with a G

[Nouveau] [Bug 91738] [NV117] NULL deref in nvkm_i2c_try_acquire_pad, kernel 4.1

2015-08-24 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91738 --- Comment #15 from ryanpcmcquen --- Thank you, I was able to get it attached. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Nouveau mailing list Nouveau@lists.freedes

[Nouveau] [Bug 91738] [NV117] NULL deref in nvkm_i2c_try_acquire_pad, kernel 4.1

2015-08-24 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91738 --- Comment #14 from ryanpcmcquen --- Created attachment 117904 --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=117904&action=edit /sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/vbios.rom -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

[Nouveau] [Bug 91738] [NV117] NULL deref in nvkm_i2c_try_acquire_pad, kernel 4.1

2015-08-24 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91738 --- Comment #13 from Ilia Mirkin --- Add nouveau.modeset=0 to your kernel cmdline, that should prevent nouveau from loading. I believe that xcmddc is killing of CPU's one-by-one as nouveau is mishandling something it's asking for. -- You are re

[Nouveau] [Bug 91738] [NV117] NULL deref in nvkm_i2c_try_acquire_pad, kernel 4.1

2015-08-24 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91738 --- Comment #12 from ryanpcmcquen --- Sorry, trying to do this from my phone, since the computer will not stay on for more than a few minutes. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___

[Nouveau] [Bug 91738] [NV117] NULL deref in nvkm_i2c_try_acquire_pad, kernel 4.1

2015-08-24 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91738 --- Comment #11 from Ilia Mirkin --- Please attach files here. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Nouveau mailing list Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org http://l

[Nouveau] [Bug 91738] [NV117] NULL deref in nvkm_i2c_try_acquire_pad, kernel 4.1

2015-08-24 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91738 --- Comment #10 from ryanpcmcquen --- Ah, I did not know that! Learning is fun. :-) As requested, vbios.rom: http://sprunge.us/fLiF Also the system is still experiencing a hard lock up after a few minutes, so this is definitely worth investig

[Nouveau] [Bug 91738] [NV117] NULL deref in nvkm_i2c_try_acquire_pad, kernel 4.1

2015-08-24 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91738 Ilia Mirkin changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[NV117] xf86-video-nouveau |[NV117] NULL deref in |1

[Nouveau] [Bug 91738] [NV117] xf86-video-nouveau 1.0.11 will not allow X to start

2015-08-24 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91738 ryanpcmcquen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED Resolution|FIXED

[Nouveau] [Bug 91738] [NV117] xf86-video-nouveau 1.0.11 will not allow X to start

2015-08-24 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91738 --- Comment #7 from Ilia Mirkin --- Looks like you still have the same failure from xcmddc. IMO it's worth investigating/fixing. Will need your vbios though, as I mentioned before. [8.700223] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer derefer

[Nouveau] [Bug 91738] [NV117] xf86-video-nouveau 1.0.11 will not allow X to start

2015-08-24 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91738 ryanpcmcquen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

Re: [Nouveau] [Mesa-dev] [PATCH] nv50: avoid using inline vertex data submit when gl_VertexID is used

2015-08-24 Thread Samuel Pitoiset
On 08/24/2015 10:02 PM, Ilia Mirkin wrote: Edge flag stuff is annoying. Pretty sure only blender uses it. shade model = flat should get fixed on nv50 before edge flags, since blender uses that too, and it's produces much worse visual artifacts. No rush for this one though. I'm having secon

Re: [Nouveau] [Mesa-dev] [PATCH] nv50: avoid using inline vertex data submit when gl_VertexID is used

2015-08-24 Thread Ilia Mirkin
Edge flag stuff is annoying. Pretty sure only blender uses it. shade model = flat should get fixed on nv50 before edge flags, since blender uses that too, and it's produces much worse visual artifacts. I'm having second thoughts about this patch. I think I'm going to go back to my previous approac

Re: [Nouveau] [Mesa-dev] [PATCH] nv50: avoid using inline vertex data submit when gl_VertexID is used

2015-08-24 Thread Samuel Pitoiset
Reviewed-by: Samuel Pitoiset This fix is simpler than I was expected. What about the edge flag stuff now? :) On 08/24/2015 05:51 PM, Ilia Mirkin wrote: The hardware only generates vertexid when vertices come from a VBO. This fixes: vertexid-drawelements vertexid-drawarrays Signed-off

[Nouveau] [PATCH libdrm 15/17] nouveau: use designated initializers

2015-08-24 Thread Emil Velikov
Cc: nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov --- nouveau/abi16.c | 13 ++--- nouveau/nouveau.c | 6 +++--- 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/nouveau/abi16.c b/nouveau/abi16.c index 4ca0bfb..59bc436 100644 --- a/nouveau/abi16.c +++ b/nouvea

Re: [Nouveau] [PATCH] nv50: avoid using inline vertex data submit when gl_VertexID is used

2015-08-24 Thread Ilia Mirkin
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 11:57 AM, Tobias Klausmann wrote: > > > On 24.08.2015 17:51, Ilia Mirkin wrote: >> >> The hardware only generates vertexid when vertices come from a VBO. This >> fixes: >> >>vertexid-drawelements >>vertexid-drawarrays >> >> Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin >> Cc: "11.0"

Re: [Nouveau] [PATCH] nv50: avoid using inline vertex data submit when gl_VertexID is used

2015-08-24 Thread Tobias Klausmann
On 24.08.2015 17:51, Ilia Mirkin wrote: The hardware only generates vertexid when vertices come from a VBO. This fixes: vertexid-drawelements vertexid-drawarrays Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin Cc: "11.0" --- src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/nv50/nv50_program.c| 1 + src/gallium/driv

[Nouveau] [PATCH] nv50: avoid using inline vertex data submit when gl_VertexID is used

2015-08-24 Thread Ilia Mirkin
The hardware only generates vertexid when vertices come from a VBO. This fixes: vertexid-drawelements vertexid-drawarrays Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin Cc: "11.0" --- src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/nv50/nv50_program.c| 1 + src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/nv50/nv50_program.h| 1 + sr

[Nouveau] [Bug 91632] Assert in nouveau_pushbuf_data

2015-08-24 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91632 --- Comment #3 from Ilia Mirkin --- (In reply to Allan Sandfeld from comment #2) > The original qtwebengine bug is at > https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-41242 > > One interesting thing I discovered was that using the EGL/GLES mode instead >

[Nouveau] [Bug 91632] Assert in nouveau_pushbuf_data

2015-08-24 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91632 --- Comment #2 from Allan Sandfeld --- The original qtwebengine bug is at https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-41242 One interesting thing I discovered was that using the EGL/GLES mode instead of GLX/GL solved the issue. I assume at your level

[Nouveau] [Bug 91632] Assert in nouveau_pushbuf_data

2015-08-24 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91632 --- Comment #1 from Ilia Mirkin --- I've seen that a few times... My analysis was that there's a fixed number of GEM objects and we're running out of them. Which means that the GPU is either locked up or way way WAY behind. However I haven't conf