Am 13.05.20 um 14:34 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 01:03:13PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
Even when core AGP support is compiled in Radeon and
Nouveau can also work with the PCI GART.
The AGP support was notorious unstable and hard to
maintain, so deprecate it for now and onl
On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 01:03:13PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
> Even when core AGP support is compiled in Radeon and
> Nouveau can also work with the PCI GART.
>
> The AGP support was notorious unstable and hard to
> maintain, so deprecate it for now and only enable it if
> there is a good reas
Even when core AGP support is compiled in Radeon and
Nouveau can also work with the PCI GART.
The AGP support was notorious unstable and hard to
maintain, so deprecate it for now and only enable it if
there is a good reason to do so.
Signed-off-by: Christian König
---
drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig
Always use the PCI GART instead.
Signed-off-by: Christian König
---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_drv.c | 5 -
1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_drv.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_drv.c
index bbb0883e8ce6..a71f13116d6b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm
Unfortunately AGP is still to widely used as we could just drop support for
using its GART.
Not using the AGP GART also doesn't mean a loss in functionality since drivers
will just fallback to the driver specific PCI GART.
For now just deprecate the code and don't enable the AGP GART in TTM eve
Hi
Am 13.05.20 um 11:27 schrieb Emil Velikov:
> On Tue, 12 May 2020 at 20:48, Alex Deucher wrote:
>
>
> There's some AGP support code in the DRM core. Can some of that declared
> as legacy?
>
> Specifically, what about these AGP-related ioctl calls? Can they be
> declared
Hi
Am 11.05.20 um 19:17 schrieb Christian König:
> Hi guys,
>
> Well let's face it AGP is a total headache to maintain and dead for at least
> 10+ years.
>
> We have a lot of x86 specific stuff in the architecture independent graphics
> memory management to get the caching right, abusing the D
On Tue, 12 May 2020 at 20:48, Alex Deucher wrote:
> > >>
> > >> There's some AGP support code in the DRM core. Can some of that declared
> > >> as legacy?
> > >>
> > >> Specifically, what about these AGP-related ioctl calls? Can they be
> > >> declared as legacy? It would appear to me that KMS-ba
On 2020-05-13 9:46 a.m., Christian König wrote:
> Am 12.05.20 um 23:12 schrieb Alex Deucher:
>> On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 4:52 PM Roy Spliet wrote:
>>>
>>> I'll volunteer to be the one asking: how big is this performance
>>> difference? Have any benchmarks been run before and after removal of AGP
>>
Am 12.05.20 um 23:12 schrieb Alex Deucher:
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 4:52 PM Roy Spliet wrote:
Op 12-05-2020 om 14:36 schreef Alex Deucher:
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 4:16 AM Michel Dänzer wrote:
On 2020-05-11 10:12 p.m., Alex Deucher wrote:
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 1:17 PM Christian König
wrote
10 matches
Mail list logo
