On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 05:34:15PM -0400, Lyude Paul wrote:
> (adding Ville and Imre to the cc here, they might be interested to know about
> this, comments down below)
>
> On Wed, 2020-08-19 at 11:15 -0400, Sean Paul wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 04:04:50PM -0400, Lyude Paul wrote:
> > >
We're going to be doing the same probing process in nouveau for
determining downstream DP port capabilities, so let's deduplicate the
work by moving i915's code for handling this into a shared helper:
drm_dp_downstream_read_info().
Note that when we do this, we also do make some functional
And of course, we'll also need to read the sink count from other drivers
as well if we're checking whether or not it's supported. So, let's
extract the code for this into another helper.
v2:
* Fix drm_dp_dpcd_readb() ret check
* Add back comment and move back sink_count assignment in
Since other drivers are also going to need to be aware of the sink count
in order to do proper dongle detection, we might as well steal i915's
DP_SINK_COUNT helpers and move them into DRM helpers so that other
dirvers can use them as well.
Note that this also starts using
Just a tiny drive-by cleanup, we can consolidate i915's code for
checking for MST support into a helper to be shared across drivers.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul
Reviewed-by: Sean Paul
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 18 ++
include/drm/drm_dp_mst_helper.h |
Since DP 1.3, it's been possible for DP receivers to specify an
additional set of DPCD capabilities, which can take precedence over the
capabilities reported at DP_DPCD_REV.
Basically any device supporting DP is going to need to read these in an
identical manner, in particular nouveau, so let's
First some backstory here: Currently, we keep track of whether or not
we've enabled MST or not by trying to piggy-back off the MST helpers.
This means that in order to check whether MST is enabled or not, we
actually need to grab drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr.lock.
Back when I originally wrote this, I
Noticed this while going through our DP code - we use an open-coded
version of drm_dp_read_desc() instead of just using the helper, so
change that. This will also let us use quirks in the future if we end up
needing them.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul
Reviewed-by: Ben Skeggs
---
Currently in nouveau_connector_ddc_detect() and
nouveau_connector_detect_lvds(), we start the connector probing process
by releasing the previous EDID and informing DRM of the change. However,
since commit 5186421cbfe2 ("drm: Introduce epoch counter to
drm_connector")
This is another bit that we never implemented for nouveau: dongle
detection. When a "dongle", e.g. an active display adaptor, is hooked up
to the system and causes an HPD to be fired, we don't actually know
whether or not there's anything plugged into the dongle without checking
the sink count. As
Since fa3cdf8d0b09 ("drm/nouveau: Reset MST branching unit before
enabling") we've been clearing DP_MST_CTRL before we start enabling MST.
Since then clearing DP_MST_CTRL in nv50_mstm_new() has been unnecessary
and redundant, so let's remove it.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul
Reviewed-by: Ben Skeggs
Now that we've extracted i915's code for reading both the normal DPCD
caps and extended DPCD caps into a shared helper, let's start using this
in nouveau to enable us to start checking extended DPCD caps for free.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul
Reviewed-by: Ben Skeggs
---
Just use drm_dp_dpcd_(readb|writeb)() so we get automatic DPCD logging
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul
Reviewed-by: Ben Skeggs
---
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/disp.c | 11 +++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/disp.c
Since this actually logs accesses, we should probably always be using
this imho…
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul
Reviewed-by: Ben Skeggs
---
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dp.c | 12
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dp.c
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul
Reviewed-by: Ben Skeggs
---
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dp.c | 16 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dp.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dp.c
index 032afc73e2a33..201c0b4335563 100644
Currently we perform both short IRQ handling for DP, and connector
reprobing in the HPD IRQ handler. However since we need to grab
connection_mutex in order to reprobe a connector, in theory we could
accidentally block ourselves from handling any short IRQs until after a
modeset completes if a
While the way we find the associated connector for an encoder is just
fine for legacy modesetting, it's not correct for nv50+ since that uses
atomic modesetting. For reference, see the drm_encoder kdocs.
Fix this by removing nouveau_encoder_connector_get(), and replacing it
with
No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul
Reviewed-by: Ben Skeggs
---
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dp.c | 8 +---
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dp.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dp.c
index
To start off: this patch series is less work to review then it looks -
most (but not all) of the nouveau related work has already been reviewed
elsewhere. Most of the reason I'm asking for an RFC here is because this
code pulls a lot of code out of i915 and into shared DP helpers.
For whatever reason we currently unset the EDID for DP CEC support when
responding to the connector being unplugged, instead of just doing it in
nouveau_connector_detect() where we set the CEC EDID. This isn't really
needed and could even potentially cause us to forget to unset the EDID
if the
This adds support for querying the maximum clock rate of a downstream
port on a DisplayPort connection. Generally, downstream ports refer to
active dongles which can have their own pixel clock limits.
Note as well, we also start marking the connector as disconnected if we
can't read the DPCD,
On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 6:52 PM Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 12:24:31PM +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> > > Of course this still uses the scatterlist structure with its annoying
> > > mix of input and output parametes, so I'd rather not expose it as
> > > an official API at
On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 12:05:29PM +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> The UAPI and V4L2/videobuf2 changes are in good shape and the only
> wrong part is the use of DMA API, which was based on an earlier email
> guidance anyway, and a change to the synchronization part . I find
> conclusions like the
On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 12:09:34PM +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> > I'm happy to Cc and active participant in the discussion. I'm not
> > going to add all reviewers because even with the trimmed CC list
> > I'm already hitting the number of receipients limit on various lists.
>
> Fair enough.
>
>
On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 12:24:31PM +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> > Of course this still uses the scatterlist structure with its annoying
> > mix of input and output parametes, so I'd rather not expose it as
> > an official API at the DMA layer.
>
> The problem with the above open coded approach is
On Wed, 2020-08-19 at 11:29 -0400, Sean Paul wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 04:04:56PM -0400, Lyude Paul wrote:
> > Since DP 1.3, it's been possible for DP receivers to specify an
> > additional set of DPCD capabilities, which can take precedence over the
> > capabilities reported at
On Wed, 2020-08-19 at 11:29 -0400, Sean Paul wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 04:04:56PM -0400, Lyude Paul wrote:
> > Since DP 1.3, it's been possible for DP receivers to specify an
> > additional set of DPCD capabilities, which can take precedence over the
> > capabilities reported at
Please ignore this one, it's to hot here and I'm typing to fast :)
Christian.
Am 20.08.20 um 17:24 schrieb Christian König:
drm-next reverted the changes to ttm_tt_create() to do the
NULL check inside the function, but drm-misc-next adds new
users of this approach.
Re-apply the NULL check
From: Christian König
While working on TTM cleanups I've found that the io_reserve_lru used by
Nouveau is actually not working at all.
In general we should remove driver specific handling from the memory
management, so this patch moves the io_reserve_lru handling into Nouveau
instead.
The
Hi guys,
I already tried this a few month ago, but since I don't have NVidia hardware
its rather hard to test for me (need to get some ordered).
Dave brought up the topic that we should probably try to move the handling into
Nouveau once more, so I tried to fix the problem Ben reported and
drm-next reverted the changes to ttm_tt_create() to do the
NULL check inside the function, but drm-misc-next adds new
users of this approach.
Re-apply the NULL check change inside the function to fix this.
Signed-off-by: Christian König
Reviewed-by: Dave Airlie
Link:
On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 7:02 AM Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 03:07:04PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
> >> FWIW, I asked back in time what the plan is for non-coherent
> >> allocations and it seemed like DMA_ATTR_NON_CONSISTENT and
> >> dma_sync_*() was supposed to be the
On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 6:45 AM Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 04:11:52PM +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> > > > By the way, as a videobuf2 reviewer, I'd appreciate being CC'd on any
> > > > series related to the subsystem-facing DMA API changes, since
> > > > videobuf2 is one of
On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 7:20 AM Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 06:43:47AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 03:57:53PM +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> > > > > Could you explain what makes you think it's unused? It's a feature of
> > > > > the UAPI
34 matches
Mail list logo
