Re: [Nouveau] [PATCH drm-misc-next 2/3] drm/gpuva_mgr: generalize dma_resv/extobj handling and GEM validation

Hi Danilo, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on 25205087df1ffe06ccea9302944ed1f77dc68c6f] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Danilo-Krummrich/drm-drm_exec-build-always-builtin/20230821-123143 base

Re: [Nouveau] [PATCH drm-misc-next 2/3] drm/gpuva_mgr: generalize dma_resv/extobj handling and GEM validation

Hi Danilo, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on 25205087df1ffe06ccea9302944ed1f77dc68c6f] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Danilo-Krummrich/drm-drm_exec-build-always-builtin/20230821-123143 base

Re: [Nouveau] [PATCH drm-misc-next 2/3] drm/gpuva_mgr: generalize dma_resv/extobj handling and GEM validation

Hi Danilo, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on 25205087df1ffe06ccea9302944ed1f77dc68c6f] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Danilo-Krummrich/drm-drm_exec-build-always-builtin/20230821-123143 base

Re: [Nouveau] [PATCH drm-misc-next 1/3] drm: drm_exec: build always builtin

On 8/21/23 11:49, Christian König wrote: Am 20.08.23 um 23:53 schrieb Danilo Krummrich: drm_exec must always be builtin for the DRM GPUVA manager to depend on it. You should probably go the other way around and not always build in the GPUVA manager. Yes, I think that's reasonable. Currently

Re: [Nouveau] [PATCH drm-misc-next 1/3] drm: drm_exec: build always builtin

Am 20.08.23 um 23:53 schrieb Danilo Krummrich: drm_exec must always be builtin for the DRM GPUVA manager to depend on it. You should probably go the other way around and not always build in the GPUVA manager. We have intentionally and with quite a bit of work moved the DRM_EXEC and DRM_BUDD