Hi,
On 2023/9/7 17:08, Christian König wrote:
I strongly suggest that you just completely drop this here
Drop this is OK, no problem. Then I will go to develop something else.
This version is not intended to merge originally, as it's a RFC.
Also, the core mechanism already finished, it is
Am 07.09.23 um 17:26 schrieb suijingfeng:
[SNIP]
Then, I'll give you another example, see below for elaborate description.
I have one AMD BC160 GPU, see[1] to get what it looks like.
The GPU don't has a display connector interface exported.
It actually can be seen as a render-only GPU or
Hi,
On 2023/9/7 20:43, Christian König wrote:
Am 07.09.23 um 14:32 schrieb suijingfeng:
Hi,
On 2023/9/7 17:08, Christian König wrote:
Well, I have over 25 years of experience with display hardware and
what you describe here was never an issue.
I want to give you an example to let you
Am 07.09.23 um 14:32 schrieb suijingfeng:
Hi,
On 2023/9/7 17:08, Christian König wrote:
Well, I have over 25 years of experience with display hardware and
what you describe here was never an issue.
I want to give you an example to let you know more.
I have a ASRock AD2550B-ITX board[1],
Hi,
On 2023/9/7 17:08, Christian König wrote:
Well, I have over 25 years of experience with display hardware and
what you describe here was never an issue.
I want to give you an example to let you know more.
I have a ASRock AD2550B-ITX board[1],
When another discrete video card is mounted
On Wed, 06 Sep 2023, suijingfeng wrote:
> Another limitation of the 'nomodeset' parameter is that
> it is only available on recent upstream kernel. Low version
> downstream kernel don't has this parameter supported yet.
> So this create inconstant developing experience. I believe that
> there
On 9/7/23 10:42, Boris Brezillon wrote:
On Wed, 6 Sep 2023 23:47:13 +0200
Danilo Krummrich wrote:
+void drm_gpuvm_bo_destroy(struct kref *kref);
I usually keep kref's release functions private so people are not
tempted to use them.
I think I did that because drm_gpuvm_bo_put() needs it.
On 9/7/23 10:16, Boris Brezillon wrote:
On Wed, 6 Sep 2023 23:47:13 +0200
Danilo Krummrich wrote:
@@ -812,15 +967,20 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(drm_gpuva_remove);
/**
* drm_gpuva_link() - link a _gpuva
* @va: the _gpuva to link
+ * @vm_bo: the _gpuvm_bo to add the _gpuva to
*
- * This
Am 07.09.23 um 04:30 schrieb Sui Jingfeng:
Hi,
On 2023/9/6 17:40, Christian König wrote:
Am 06.09.23 um 11:08 schrieb suijingfeng:
Well, welcome to correct me if I'm wrong.
You seem to have some very basic misunderstandings here.
The term framebuffer describes some VRAM memory used for
On 9/7/23 09:56, Boris Brezillon wrote:
On Wed, 6 Sep 2023 23:47:10 +0200
Danilo Krummrich wrote:
Rename struct drm_gpuva_manager to struct drm_gpuvm including
corresponding functions. This way the GPUVA manager's structures align
very well with the documentation of VM_BIND [1] and VM_BIND
Hi Danilo,
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
[auto build test WARNING on 6bd3d8da51ca1ec97c724016466606aec7739b9f]
url:
https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Danilo-Krummrich/drm-gpuva_mgr-allow-building-as-module/20230907-054931
base
11 matches
Mail list logo
