On Wed, 12 Jul 2023, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 12:46:33PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
> > Am 12.07.23 um 11:46 schrieb Uwe Kleine-König:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > while I debugged an issue in the imx-lcdc driver I was constantly
> > > irritated about struct drm_device
Spelling mistake (triple letters) in comment.
Detected with the help of Coccinelle.
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall
---
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/mmu/vmm.c |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/mmu/vmm.c
b/drivers/gpu
On Sat, 17 Oct 2020, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Sat, 2020-10-17 at 09:09 -0700, t...@redhat.com wrote:
> > From: Tom Rix
> >
> > This is a upcoming change to clean up a new warning treewide.
> > I am wondering if the change could be one mega patch (see below) or
> > normal patch per file about
From: kbuild test robot
To: kbu...@01.org
Cc: Julia Lawall
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] drm/dp_mst: Introduce
drm_dp_mst_connector_atomic_check()
CC: kbuild-...@01.org
In-Reply-To: <20180918230637.20700-2-ly...@redhat.com>
References: <20180918230637.20700-2-ly...@redhat.com>
TO: Ly
ld test robot
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall
---
tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git
master
head: b36fdc6853a38a6f8749897a33435635019e0647
commit: eaeb9010bb4bcdc20e58254fa42f3fe730a7f908 drm/nouveau/debugfs: Wake up
GPU before doing any reclocking
:: br
ld test robot
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall
---
Please take the patch only if it's a positive warning. Thanks!
nouveau_debugfs.c |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_debugfs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_debugfs.c
@@
0/")
Signed-off-by: kbuild test robot <fengguang...@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia.law...@lip6.fr>
---
tree: https://github.com/skeggsb/linux linux-4.18
head: 6c46d01f25bcf74608d09645c27c35c3f3940ebe
commit: 30ed49b55b6e44e004c3095671e74fea93ee84cb [105/165]
drm/
On Sun, 25 Mar 2018, Arushi Singhal wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 12:44 PM, Julia Lawall <julia.law...@lip6.fr> wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 19 Mar 2018, Arushi Singhal wrote:
>
> > This patch replace list_entry with list_{next/prev}_entry as
>
On Sun, 25 Mar 2018, Arushi Singhal wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 12:44 PM, Julia Lawall <julia.law...@lip6.fr> wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 19 Mar 2018, Arushi Singhal wrote:
>
> > This patch replace list_entry with list_{next/prev}_entry as
>
On Mon, 19 Mar 2018, Arushi Singhal wrote:
> This patch replace list_entry with list_{next/prev}_entry as it makes
> the code more clear to read.
> Done using coccinelle:
>
> @@
> expression e1;
> identifier e3;
> type t;
> @@
> (
> - list_entry(e1->e3.next,t,e3)
> + list_next_entry(e1,e3)
> |
On Mon, 15 Jan 2018, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 01:47:07PM +0100, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > From: Fengguang Wu <fengguang...@intel.com>
> >
> > Use drm_*_get() and drm_*_put() helpers instead of drm_*_reference() and
> > drm_*_unrefer
From: Fengguang Wu <fengguang...@intel.com>
Use drm_*_get() and drm_*_put() helpers instead of drm_*_reference() and
drm_*_unreference() helpers.
Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/api/drm-get-put.cocci
Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang...@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawal
it isn't necessary.
Will someone take care of it? I'm just the 0-day proxy :)
julia
> On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 1:56 PM, Julia Lawall <julia.law...@lip6.fr> wrote:
> > This is a false positive, but I wonder if it is really necessary to put
> > the assign
This is a false positive, but I wonder if it is really necessary to put
the assignment in the conditional test expression.
julia
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 13:23:36 +0800
From: kbuild test robot <fengguang...@intel.com>
To: kbu...@01.org
Cc: Julia
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia.law...@lip6.fr>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/gk20a.c |1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/gk20a.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/gk20a.c
index 4ca8ed1..de8b806 100644
--- a/d
From: Julia Lawall ju...@diku.dk
Test the just-allocated value for NULL rather than some other value.
The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:
(http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// smpl
@@
expression x,y;
statement S;
@@
x = \(kmalloc\|kcalloc\|kzalloc\)(...);
(
if ((x) == NULL) S
16 matches
Mail list logo
