https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90871
--- Comment #1 from poma ---
- Fedora 21 - working Xfvm4 compositing setup:
xorg-x11-server-Xorg 1.16.3-2.fc21
xorg-x11-drv-nouveau 1.0.11-1.fc21
mesa 10.4.7-1.20150323.fc21
libdrm 2.4.60-1.fc21
libXpresent 1.0.0-1.fc21
xfwm4 4.12.3-3.git201505
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90871
--- Comment #2 from poma ---
All component downgraded to versions such as working setup on Fedora 21,
but without positive effect.
Looks like libepoxy has become broken for unknown reasons.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the a
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90871
--- Comment #3 from Olivier Fourdan ---
(In reply to poma from comment #2)
> All component downgraded to versions such as working setup on Fedora 21,
> but without positive effect.
> Looks like libepoxy has become broken for unknown reasons.
You
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90871
--- Comment #4 from poma ---
What I actually wanted to write,
epoxy support is related to the usage, enablement of the OpenGL, right?
And here it is about compositing part.
If I understood this library simplifies writing code related to OpenGL.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90871
poma changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|critical|major
--- Comment #5 from poma ---
I recompiled
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90871
poma changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|Driver/nouveau |Drivers/DRI/nouveau
Version|unspecifie
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90871
poma changed:
What|Removed |Added
Hardware|x86 (IA32) |x86-64 (AMD64)
--
You are receiving this mail be
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90871
poma changed:
What|Removed |Added
Hardware|x86-64 (AMD64) |x86 (IA32)
--
You are receiving this mail becaus
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90871
poma changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|10.5|git
--- Comment #6 from poma ---
Same with late
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90871
--- Comment #7 from poma ---
Created attachment 116415
--> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=116415&action=edit
Xfwm4 GLX compositing NV34 Mesa 10.7.0 devel git 563706c
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Conta
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90871
--- Comment #8 from poma ---
Created attachment 116416
--> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=116416&action=edit
glxinfo NV34 OpenGL 1.5 Mesa 10.7.0 devel git 563706c
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90871
--- Comment #9 from poma ---
(In reply to poma from comment #5)
...
> Interestingly, in contrast to Xorg-1.17.1,
> on Xorg-1.16.3 NV30 can work with 'modesetting':
>
FTR
Xorg-1.17.1 'modesetting' ist kaputt also with NV50.
--
You are receivin
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90871
--- Comment #10 from poma ---
(In reply to poma from comment #9)
> (In reply to poma from comment #5)
> ...
> > Interestingly, in contrast to Xorg-1.17.1,
> > on Xorg-1.16.3 NV30 can work with 'modesetting':
> >
>
> FTR
> Xorg-1.17.1 'modesetti
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90871
--- Comment #11 from Olivier Fourdan ---
Created attachment 116536
--> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=116536&action=edit
test program
Can you try with this test program and see if you can reproduce:
1. Save attachment as tfp-
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90871
--- Comment #12 from Ilia Mirkin ---
BTW, irrespective of any shortcomings in the modesetting driver, there's 0
chance that GLAMOR will work on nv3x. And like 0.1% chance
it'll work on nv4x. The driver logic is just not there to h
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90871
--- Comment #13 from poma ---
Created attachment 116544
--> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=116544&action=edit
xfwm4-debug-1328.log
xfwm4-4.12.3-11.3.glx.debug.full.git20150615.fc22.i686
xfwm4-debuginfo-4.12.3-11.3.glx.debug.fu
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90871
--- Comment #14 from Olivier Fourdan ---
(In reply to poma from comment #13)
I am not sure xfwm4 logs will help much here.
What about the test program I posted in comment 11, it does the same as xfwm4
but in a much shorter/simpler code so if yo
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90871
--- Comment #15 from poma ---
(In reply to Olivier Fourdan from comment #14)
> (In reply to poma from comment #13)
>
> I am not sure xfwm4 logs will help much here.
>
> What about the test program I posted in comment 11, it does the same as
> x
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90871
--- Comment #16 from poma ---
Created attachment 117490
--> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=117490&action=edit
lovelock.png OK - no comps
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
You are the a
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90871
--- Comment #17 from poma ---
Created attachment 117491
--> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=117491&action=edit
lovelock.png KO/garbled - comps GLX
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
You
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90871
--- Comment #18 from poma ---
Olivier, can you tell, just by looking at garbled pattern, what the actual
problem is, the same as Hans de and Ilia do in
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/nouveau/2015-August/021767.html
"Look at the white patt
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90871
--- Comment #19 from Ilia Mirkin ---
Harder to tell, but I think one of two things is happening:
(a) You have the inverse problem. You're getting a linear texture that's being
interpreted as if it were swizzled.
(b) Uninitialized video ram which
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90871
--- Comment #20 from poma ---
Thanks for the explanation.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Nouveau mailing list
Nouveau
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90871
--- Comment #21 from poma ---
Test GLX compositing & tfp-test:
http://goo.gl/Gm4ffO
vids/discothèque.webm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90871
--- Comment #22 from Hans de Goede ---
I've tried reproducing this on my oldest card which is a nv43 card, but I'm
afraid that this does not reproduce there ...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
You are
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90871
--- Comment #23 from poma ---
Hans, do you test exclusively GNOME environment?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Nouveau
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90871
--- Comment #24 from Hans de Goede ---
Hi,
(In reply to poma from comment #23)
> Hans, do you test exclusively GNOME environment?
No to reproduce I did "dnf groupinstall "XFCE Desktop", then startxfce4, and
ensured it was in composting mode, al
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90871
--- Comment #25 from poma ---
(In reply to Hans de Goede from comment #24)
> Hi,
>
> (In reply to poma from comment #23)
> > Hans, do you test exclusively GNOME environment?
>
> No to reproduce I did "dnf groupinstall "XFCE Desktop", then start
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90871
--- Comment #26 from Hans de Goede ---
(In reply to poma from comment #25)
> Here you can find the source rpm of the Xfce's window manager with GLX
> support:
> http://goo.gl/Gm4ffO
> source/xfwm4-4.12.3-11.2.glx.git20150615.fc22.src.rpm
>
> Bes
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90871
--- Comment #27 from poma ---
(In reply to Hans de Goede from comment #26)
> (In reply to poma from comment #25)
> > Here you can find the source rpm of the Xfce's window manager with GLX
> > support:
> > http://goo.gl/Gm4ffO
> > source/xfwm4-4.1
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90871
--- Comment #28 from Hans de Goede ---
Hi,
(In reply to poma from comment #27)
> (In reply to Hans de Goede from comment #26)
> > (In reply to poma from comment #25)
> > > Here you can find the source rpm of the Xfce's window manager with GLX
> >
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90871
--- Comment #29 from poma ---
Thanks for testing, man.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Nouveau mailing list
Nouveau@li
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90871
--- Comment #30 from Olivier Fourdan ---
You'd need xfwm4 from git master (with opengl support) to reproduce or simply
use the simple reproducer I attached to this bug some time ago (attachment
116536)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Yo
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90871
--- Comment #31 from poma ---
Repetitio est mater sapientiae.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Nouveau mailing list
Nou
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90871
--- Comment #32 from Hans de Goede ---
Hi,
(In reply to Olivier Fourdan from comment #30)
> You'd need xfwm4 from git master (with opengl support) to reproduce or
> simply use the simple reproducer I attached to this bug some time ago
> (attachm
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90871
--- Comment #33 from poma ---
(In reply to Hans de Goede from comment #32)
> Hi,
>
> (In reply to Olivier Fourdan from comment #30)
> > You'd need xfwm4 from git master (with opengl support) to reproduce or
> > simply use the simple reproducer I
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90871
--- Comment #34 from Hans de Goede ---
Hi,
(In reply to Hans de Goede from comment #32)
> Hi,
>
> (In reply to Olivier Fourdan from comment #30)
> > You'd need xfwm4 from git master (with opengl support) to reproduce or
> > simply use the simpl
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90871
Hans de Goede changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #35 from Hans de Go
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90871
--- Comment #36 from poma ---
ACPI power states test:
- Suspend to RAM aka S3
- Suspend to Disk aka S4
Xfwm4 flavours:
- "vulgaris" - built w/ --disable-epoxy --disable-xpresent
- "xpresent" - built w/ --disable-epoxy
- "glx"
ACPI:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90871
--- Comment #37 from poma ---
dmesg - S4 RESUME(THAW) - Xfwm4 "xpresent" - when compositing turned on:
nouveau E[ PGRAPH][:01:00.0] (unknown bits 0x0080) nsource: nstatus:
nouveau E[ PGRAPH][:01:00.0] ch 1 [Xorg[493]] subc 0 clas
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90871
--- Comment #38 from Hans de Goede ---
(In reply to Hans de Goede from comment #35)
> The problem is the next messages. It seems that something (not fptest
> directly) is calling glTexImage2D with a npot width / height, where as nv3x
> is not npo
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90871
--- Comment #39 from poma ---
Has there been any progress, any preliminary patch to test?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90871
--- Comment #40 from Hans de Goede ---
Hi All,
(In reply to Olivier Fourdan from comment #11)
> Created attachment 116536 [details]
> test program
So after some time away from this bug, I'm back onto it. The problem is that
the test program end
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90871
--- Comment #41 from Ilia Mirkin ---
(In reply to Hans de Goede from comment #40)
> Hi All,
>
> (In reply to Olivier Fourdan from comment #11)
> > Created attachment 116536 [details]
> > test program
>
> So after some time away from this bug, I
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90871
--- Comment #42 from Ilia Mirkin ---
(In reply to Ilia Mirkin from comment #41)
> (In reply to Hans de Goede from comment #40)
> > Hi All,
> >
> > (In reply to Olivier Fourdan from comment #11)
> > > Created attachment 116536 [details]
> > > tes
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90871
--- Comment #43 from Ilia Mirkin ---
Created attachment 118995
--> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=118995&action=edit
updated test program
With this I get the same results whether I set has_texture_rectangle = 1 or 0.
Attached t
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90871
--- Comment #44 from Hans de Goede ---
Hi Ilia,
(In reply to Ilia Mirkin from comment #43)
> Created attachment 118995 [details]
> updated test program
>
> With this I get the same results whether I set has_texture_rectangle = 1 or
> 0. Attache
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90871
--- Comment #45 from poma ---
Check out with latest and greatest - epoxy:
http://goo.gl/Gm4ffO
glx/
libepoxy 1.3.1 git b3b8bd9 - 20150929
https://github.com/yaronct/libepoxy
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for t
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90871
--- Comment #46 from Ilia Mirkin ---
(In reply to Hans de Goede from comment #44)
> Hi Ilia,
>
> (In reply to Ilia Mirkin from comment #43)
> > Created attachment 118995 [details]
> > updated test program
> >
> > With this I get the same result
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90871
--- Comment #47 from Olivier Fourdan ---
(In reply to Ilia Mirkin from comment #46)
> Just my incompetence
Mine, rather.
> glMatrixMode has to go *before* glPushMatrix, not
> after. Oops. Moving it up makes the program behave as expected, at le
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90871
--- Comment #48 from Ilia Mirkin ---
(In reply to Olivier Fourdan from comment #47)
> (In reply to Ilia Mirkin from comment #46)
> > Pretty sure it's what I said -- the test program doesn't do a glXMakeCurrent
> > before calling gl functions, whi
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90871
Ilia Mirkin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90871
--- Comment #50 from Olivier Fourdan ---
Many thanks.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Nouveau mailing list
Nouveau@lis
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90871
--- Comment #51 from Hans de Goede ---
Hi,
(In reply to Ilia Mirkin from comment #48)
> or (b) make the assumption that rect support is an all-or-nothing thing --
> either
> no configs have it or they all do, so no need to check it when evaluat
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90871
poma changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|NOTOURBUG
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90871
--- Comment #52 from poma ---
Can it be tested before it is closed. What's the rush.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
N
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90871
Ilia Mirkin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90871
--- Comment #54 from poma ---
Thank you for your time dudes.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Nouveau mailing list
Nouv
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90871
poma changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|NOTOURBUG
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90871
Ilia Mirkin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
60 matches
Mail list logo
