On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 07:21:54PM -0700, John Hubbard wrote:
> On 6/13/19 2:43 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > Keep the physical address allocation that hmm_add_device does with the
> > rest of the resource code, and allow future reuse of it without the hmm
> > wrapper.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ch
On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 07:16:35PM +, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> I wonder if IORES_DESC_DEVICE_PRIVATE_MEMORY should be a function
> argument?
No. The only reason to use this function is to allocate the fake
physical address space for the device private memory case. If you'd
deal with real res
On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 11:43:09AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Keep the physical address allocation that hmm_add_device does with the
> rest of the resource code, and allow future reuse of it without the hmm
> wrapper.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig
> include/linux/ioport.h | 2 ++
>
Keep the physical address allocation that hmm_add_device does with the
rest of the resource code, and allow future reuse of it without the hmm
wrapper.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig
---
include/linux/ioport.h | 2 ++
kernel/resource.c | 39 +++
mm/hmm
