- Depth and stencil buffers are supposed to be large enough in general.
Signed-off-by: Maarten Maathuis madman2...@gmail.com
---
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c |9 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
On 12/27/2009 12:41 PM, Maarten Maathuis wrote:
- Depth and stencil buffers are supposed to be large enough in general.
Signed-off-by: Maarten Maathuis madman2...@gmail.com
---
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c |9 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff
On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 2:43 PM, Christoph Bumiller
e0425...@student.tuwien.ac.at wrote:
On 12/27/2009 12:41 PM, Maarten Maathuis wrote:
- Depth and stencil buffers are supposed to be large enough in general.
Signed-off-by: Maarten Maathuis madman2...@gmail.com
---
To avoid any confusion, make sure your buffers are large enough
means you shouldn't go allocating very small depth/stencil buffers,
because that will waste space. Userspace should never have to worry
about the restrictions themselves.
Maarten.
On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 3:28 PM, Maarten Maathuis
