Re: [Nouveau] [PATCH v4] pmu/gk20a: PMU boot support

2015-05-24 Thread Alexandre Courbot
- What about signature files that are required for secure boot? >>> As with above, if it's possible to ship them in a single file with the >>> ucode that it belongs to, that'd be ideal. It's not a huge deal >>> though. >> >> So here we actually have several files - it is kind of a mess >> act

Re: [Nouveau] [PATCH v4] pmu/gk20a: PMU boot support

2015-05-21 Thread Ben Skeggs
On 21 May 2015 at 18:46, Ben Skeggs wrote: > On 21 May 2015 at 16:03, Alexandre Courbot wrote: >> On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 2:37 PM, Ben Skeggs wrote: >>> On 12 May 2015 at 19:04, Alexandre Courbot wrote: Hi Ben, On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 8:01 AM, Ben Skeggs wrote: > On 13 April

Re: [Nouveau] [PATCH v4] pmu/gk20a: PMU boot support

2015-05-21 Thread Ben Skeggs
On 21 May 2015 at 16:03, Alexandre Courbot wrote: > On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 2:37 PM, Ben Skeggs wrote: >> On 12 May 2015 at 19:04, Alexandre Courbot wrote: >>> Hi Ben, >>> >>> On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 8:01 AM, Ben Skeggs wrote: On 13 April 2015 at 20:42, Alexandre Courbot wrote: > Ben,

Re: [Nouveau] [PATCH v4] pmu/gk20a: PMU boot support

2015-05-20 Thread Alexandre Courbot
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 2:37 PM, Ben Skeggs wrote: > On 12 May 2015 at 19:04, Alexandre Courbot wrote: >> Hi Ben, >> >> On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 8:01 AM, Ben Skeggs wrote: >>> On 13 April 2015 at 20:42, Alexandre Courbot wrote: Ben, I guess our main remaining concern with this patch is how i

Re: [Nouveau] [PATCH v4] pmu/gk20a: PMU boot support

2015-05-14 Thread Ben Skeggs
On 12 May 2015 at 19:04, Alexandre Courbot wrote: > Hi Ben, > > On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 8:01 AM, Ben Skeggs wrote: >> On 13 April 2015 at 20:42, Alexandre Courbot wrote: >>> Ben, I guess our main remaining concern with this patch is how it should >>> integrate wrt. the existing PMU code. Since it

Re: [Nouveau] [PATCH v4] pmu/gk20a: PMU boot support

2015-05-12 Thread Alexandre Courbot
Hi Ben, On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 8:01 AM, Ben Skeggs wrote: > On 13 April 2015 at 20:42, Alexandre Courbot wrote: >> Ben, I guess our main remaining concern with this patch is how it should >> integrate wrt. the existing PMU code. Since it is designed to interact with >> the NVIDIA firmware, maybe

Re: [Nouveau] [PATCH v4] pmu/gk20a: PMU boot support

2015-05-07 Thread Stéphane Marchesin
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 3:38 AM, Alexandre Courbot wrote: > From: Deepak Goyal > > - Maps PMU firmware into PMU virtual memory. > - Copy bootloader into PMU memory and start it. > - Allow the PMU to interact with HOST via interrupts. > > PMU after successful configurations (to follow after this p

Re: [Nouveau] [PATCH v4] pmu/gk20a: PMU boot support

2015-04-30 Thread Ben Skeggs
On 13 April 2015 at 20:42, Alexandre Courbot wrote: > Ben, I guess our main remaining concern with this patch is how it should > integrate wrt. the existing PMU code. Since it is designed to interact with > the NVIDIA firmware, maybe we should use a different base code, or do you > think we can so

Re: [Nouveau] [PATCH v4] pmu/gk20a: PMU boot support

2015-04-13 Thread Alexandre Courbot
Ben, I guess our main remaining concern with this patch is how it should integrate wrt. the existing PMU code. Since it is designed to interact with the NVIDIA firmware, maybe we should use a different base code, or do you think we can somehow share code and data structures? Deepak, as explain

[Nouveau] [PATCH v4] pmu/gk20a: PMU boot support

2015-04-13 Thread Alexandre Courbot
From: Deepak Goyal - Maps PMU firmware into PMU virtual memory. - Copy bootloader into PMU memory and start it. - Allow the PMU to interact with HOST via interrupts. PMU after successful configurations (to follow after this patch) will: 1.Autonomously power gate graphics engine when not in use.I