On 16.09.2014 01:21, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 1:28 PM, poma wrote:
>> On 15.09.2014 15:36, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>>> On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 4:23 AM, poma wrote:
Chipset: G98 (NV98)
Family : NV50
WORKING VIDEO RESUME(S3)
3.15.0-rc8.1.git.7a014a8
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 1:28 PM, poma wrote:
> On 15.09.2014 15:36, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 4:23 AM, poma wrote:
>>> Chipset: G98 (NV98)
>>> Family : NV50
>>>
>>>
>>> WORKING VIDEO RESUME(S3)
>>>
>>> 3.15.0-rc8.1.git.7a014a8
>>> 3.15.0-rc8.2.git.456b057
>>> 3.15.0-rc8.3.git.
On 15.09.2014 15:36, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 4:23 AM, poma wrote:
>> Chipset: G98 (NV98)
>> Family : NV50
>>
>>
>> WORKING VIDEO RESUME(S3)
>>
>> 3.15.0-rc8.1.git.7a014a8
>> 3.15.0-rc8.2.git.456b057
>> 3.15.0-rc8.3.git.b8407c9
>> 3.15.0-rc8.4.git.bb7ef1e
>>
>>
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 4:23 AM, poma wrote:
> Chipset: G98 (NV98)
> Family : NV50
>
>
> WORKING VIDEO RESUME(S3)
>
> 3.15.0-rc8.1.git.7a014a8
> 3.15.0-rc8.2.git.456b057
> 3.15.0-rc8.3.git.b8407c9
> 3.15.0-rc8.4.git.bb7ef1e
>
>
>
> BROKEN VIDEO RESUME(S3)
>
> STARTING WITH
On 14.09.2014 11:53, Roy Spliet wrote:
> Op 14-09-14 om 10:31 schreef poma:
>> On 13.09.2014 23:45, Roy Spliet wrote:
>>> Dear Poma,
>>>
>>> Don't get anyone wrong, your input is greatly valued. The reason why
>>> "we" (nouveau developers) generally ask for a git bisection is because
>>> we don't k
Op 14-09-14 om 10:31 schreef poma:
On 13.09.2014 23:45, Roy Spliet wrote:
Dear Poma,
Don't get anyone wrong, your input is greatly valued. The reason why
"we" (nouveau developers) generally ask for a git bisection is because
we don't know or track specific distributions. Although your search ha
On 13.09.2014 23:45, Roy Spliet wrote:
> Dear Poma,
>
> Don't get anyone wrong, your input is greatly valued. The reason why
> "we" (nouveau developers) generally ask for a git bisection is because
> we don't know or track specific distributions. Although your search has
> narrowed the problem
On 13.09.2014 23:46, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 5:25 PM, poma wrote:
>> On 13.09.2014 22:58, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>>> On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 4:52 PM, poma wrote:
On 13.09.2014 07:02, poma wrote:
> On 13.09.2014 06:57, poma wrote:
>>
>> Actually I have nothing to
On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 5:25 PM, poma wrote:
> On 13.09.2014 22:58, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>> On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 4:52 PM, poma wrote:
>>> On 13.09.2014 07:02, poma wrote:
On 13.09.2014 06:57, poma wrote:
>
> Actually I have nothing to show cause logs are all OK.
> Haha, it seems
Dear Poma,
Don't get anyone wrong, your input is greatly valued. The reason why
"we" (nouveau developers) generally ask for a git bisection is because
we don't know or track specific distributions. Although your search has
narrowed the problem down (thanks for that!), we don't know how big the
On 13.09.2014 22:58, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 4:52 PM, poma wrote:
>> On 13.09.2014 07:02, poma wrote:
>>> On 13.09.2014 06:57, poma wrote:
Actually I have nothing to show cause logs are all OK.
Haha, it seems to me that the bugs become intelligent.
3.1
On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 4:52 PM, poma wrote:
> On 13.09.2014 07:02, poma wrote:
>> On 13.09.2014 06:57, poma wrote:
>>>
>>> Actually I have nothing to show cause logs are all OK.
>>> Haha, it seems to me that the bugs become intelligent.
>>>
>>> 3.15.10-201.fc20.x86_64
>>> 3.16.2-200.fc20.x86_64
>
On 13.09.2014 07:02, poma wrote:
> On 13.09.2014 06:57, poma wrote:
>>
>> Actually I have nothing to show cause logs are all OK.
>> Haha, it seems to me that the bugs become intelligent.
>>
>> 3.15.10-201.fc20.x86_64
>> 3.16.2-200.fc20.x86_64
>> 3.17.0-0.rc4.git3.2.fc22.1.x86_64
>> nouveau [
13 matches
Mail list logo
