On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 4:14 PM, Christoph Lameter c...@linux.com wrote:
On Wed, 27 Mar 2013, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
The GPF happens at +160, which is in the argument setup for the
cmpxchg in slab_alloc_node. I think it's the call to
get_freepointer(). There was a similar bug report a while back,
On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 5:01 AM, Ilia Mirkin imir...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 4:14 PM, Christoph Lameter c...@linux.com wrote:
On Wed, 27 Mar 2013, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
The GPF happens at +160, which is in the argument setup for the
cmpxchg in slab_alloc_node. I think it's the
On Wed, 27 Mar 2013, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
The GPF happens at +160, which is in the argument setup for the
cmpxchg in slab_alloc_node. I think it's the call to
get_freepointer(). There was a similar bug report a while back,
https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/5/23/199, and the recommendation was to run
Hello,
My system died last night apparently due to OOM conditions. Note that
I don't have any swap set up, but my understanding is that this is not
required. The full log is at: http://pastebin.com/YCYUXWvV. It was in
my messages, so I guess the system took a bit to die completely.
nouveau is
On Wed 27-03-13 14:25:36, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
Hello,
My system died last night apparently due to OOM conditions. Note that
I don't have any swap set up, but my understanding is that this is not
required. The full log is at: http://pastebin.com/YCYUXWvV. It was in
my messages, so I guess the
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 11:22 AM, Michal Hocko mho...@suse.cz wrote:
On Wed 27-03-13 14:25:36, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
Hello,
My system died last night apparently due to OOM conditions. Note that
I don't have any swap set up, but my understanding is that this is not
required. The full log is at:
