On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 11:02:00PM +0200, Marcin Slusarz wrote:
Commit drm/nouveau: port all engines to new engine module format changed
IB size calculation to be less wasteful, but didn't take into account already
existing off-by-one bugs :).
So:
- ib_max is the last entry, so we need to
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 04:33:24PM +1000, Ben Skeggs wrote:
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 11:02:00PM +0200, Marcin Slusarz wrote:
Commit drm/nouveau: port all engines to new engine module format changed
IB size calculation to be less wasteful, but didn't take into account
already
existing
Am Dienstag, 21. August 2012 schrieb Marcin Slusarz :
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 04:33:24PM +1000, Ben Skeggs wrote:
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 11:02:00PM +0200, Marcin Slusarz wrote:
Commit drm/nouveau: port all engines to new engine module format
changed
IB size calculation to be less
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 07:13:23AM +1000, Ben Skeggs wrote:
Am Dienstag, 21. August 2012 schrieb Marcin Slusarz :
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 04:33:24PM +1000, Ben Skeggs wrote:
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 11:02:00PM +0200, Marcin Slusarz wrote:
Commit drm/nouveau: port all
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 11:41 PM, Marcin Slusarz
marcin.slus...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 07:13:23AM +1000, Ben Skeggs wrote:
Am Dienstag, 21. August 2012 schrieb Marcin Slusarz :
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 04:33:24PM +1000, Ben Skeggs wrote:
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at
Commit drm/nouveau: port all engines to new engine module format changed
IB size calculation to be less wasteful, but didn't take into account already
existing off-by-one bugs :).
So:
- ib_max is the last entry, so we need to +1 when calculating number of
free entries
- nv50_dma_wait already
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 11:02 PM, Marcin Slusarz
marcin.slus...@gmail.com wrote:
Commit drm/nouveau: port all engines to new engine module format changed
IB size calculation to be less wasteful, but didn't take into account already
existing off-by-one bugs :).
So:
- ib_max is the last entry,
