Re: [nox-dev] [PATCH] support passing the 64-bit cookie in send_flow_command from Python code

Hi, This is an updated and tested version of this patch for the zaku branch. Do you see any problem with this patch? BR, -- Romain Lenglet On 12/13/10 14:42, romain.leng...@berabera.info wrote: From: Romain Lengletromain.leng...@berabera.info The C++ implementation allowed passing the 64-bit

Re: [nox-dev] [PATCH] support passing the 64-bit cookie in send_flow_command from Python code

Hi KK, I format my patches with git-format-patches, and send them using git send-email. Is there any issues with the formatting? Regards, -- Romain Lenglet On 12/13/10 14:57, kk yap wrote: Hi Romain, Thanks for all the patches. I really appreciate these. Personally, I tend to work purely

[nox-dev] [PATCH] support passing the 64-bit cookie in send_flow_command from Python code

From: Romain Lenglet romain.leng...@berabera.info The C++ implementation allowed passing the 64-bit opaque cookie with every flow command, but not the Python wrapper. --- src/nox/coreapps/pyrt/context.i |3 ++- src/nox/lib/core.py | 26 ++ 2 files

Re: [nox-dev] Matching on NW_TOS doesn't seem to work?

nw_tos and nw_dst (I'm too lazy to check that right now...). -- Romain Lenglet On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 5:59 AM, Aaron Rosen aro...@clemson.edu wrote: Hi Murphy, Ok, looking at the Match values in wireshark I do not see a packet that is applying my first self.install_datapath_flow(); but I do

[nox-dev] [PATCH] support setting the binding IP address of TCP sockets for passive interfaces

From: Romain Lenglet romain.leng...@berabera.info Modify the nox_core command line arguments to accept the socket bind address for the ptcp: and pssl: interfaces. This is particularly important for the ptcp: method, as it can help improving security and performance in some cases. For instance

[nox-dev] NOX packaging issues

/Makefile.am, and the rest is handled by src/nox/Makefile.am, which is confusing. Why not just have one Makefile.am per directory, as usual, and let each Makefile.am handle all the files in its directory, and only those files? FYI, I'm working using the openflow-1.0 branch. Best regards, -- Romain

Re: [nox-dev] NOX packaging issues

is somewhat improved over master already in that it actually does at least sort of work). OK, I'll take a look at the destiny branch. Best regards, -- Romain Lenglet ___ nox-dev mailing list nox-dev@noxrepo.org http://noxrepo.org/mailman/listinfo/nox

Re: [nox-dev] NOX packaging issues

, Best regards, -- Romain Lenglet ___ nox-dev mailing list nox-dev@noxrepo.org http://noxrepo.org/mailman/listinfo/nox-dev_noxrepo.org

[nox-dev] [PATCH] Correctly set the NW_TOS wildcard bit.

From: Romain Lenglet romain.leng...@berabera.info Set the OFPFW_NW_TOS bit in the wildcards of a flow definition when no nw_tos attribute is specified, so it doesn't always set nw_tos=0 for the flow in that case. --- src/nox/lib/core.py |1 + src/nox/lib/util.py |6 ++ 2 files

[nox-dev] [PATCH] Add support for setting the TCP binding address.

From: Romain Lenglet romain.leng...@berabera.info Modify the nox_core command line arguments to accept the socket bind address for the ptcp: and pssl: connection methods. This is particularly important for the ptcp: method, as it can help improving security and performance in some cases