Hi Martin,
I do not understand. This should not make a difference, since routing
still have calculate a route, for which some OpenFlow switches might
be connected directly. Doing it hop-by-hop does not make a
difference. What am I missing here?
Regards
KK
On 24 February 2010 13:58, Martin
Again, I may not be remembering correctly, but things are complex if you
have multiple OF switches connected to a single non-OF switch. You can
get timeouts which create wierdnesses such as hosts attached to internal
ports (causing a software flood since the location is unknown).
Absolutely agreed. We should verify that the full path routing still
works as expected and then change the default configuration.
Hi Martin,
I am probably not fully appreciating the problem at hand too. My
personal experience is that installing flow entries in the reverse
direction
I notice that the routing module is behaving differently with NOX0.6
causing each switch en route to generate independent packet_ins, while
NOX0.4 generates only 1 packet_in. This behavior incurs higher flow
setup time.
I have a topology of client - hpsw3 - hpsw1 - server . I
performed a wget
