Re: [NPSO]: Indicator 14 FAQ Update [Scanned]

2009-04-17 Thread Jane Falls
ve employment" and one counted under "some other employment" because > her family owns the business? Is this question actually trying to get at the > non-community-based work (previously work at or from home) rather than who > owns the business? If not, it will have implicat

RE: [NPSO]: Indicator 14 FAQ Update [Scanned]

2009-04-17 Thread Bauserman, Adam D.
...@lists.uoregon.edu [mailto:owner-npsos...@lists.uoregon.edu] On Behalf Of Kampa, Mary Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 11:02 AM To: npsoserv@lists.uoregon.edu Subject: RE: [NPSO]: Indicator 14 FAQ Update [Scanned] Hi Jane, Like Oregon, Wisconsin will continue to use our current survey questions and interview this

RE: [NPSO]: Indicator 14 FAQ Update [Scanned]

2009-04-17 Thread Kampa, Mary
rather than who owns the business? If not, it will have implications for how we specifically word this question. Thanks much Jane, Mary From: owner-npsos...@lists.uoregon.edu on behalf of Jane Falls Sent: Thu 4/16/2009 11:59 AM To: PSO CofP Subject: