dy reported some errors in them but I cannot
remember getting patches to fix this and I have not had time to do it
myself.
Mathieu
> Thank you!
>
> Best Regards,
> Pedro Fortuna
> INESC Porto
>
> On 8/14/06, mathieu lacage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > hi pedr
On Mon, 2006-08-14 at 23:54 +0100, Pedro Fortuna wrote:
> I'll do my best trying to find the problem. I'll submit a patch if I
> succeed correcting it (assuming there's a problem).
>
> There is a question on the DCF implementation part I'd like to ask if
> you don't mind. It seems that there's no
On Wed, 2006-09-06 at 01:02 +0100, Pedro Fortuna wrote:
> "if ((*tmp).second + m_parameters->getMSDULifetime () > now) {"
>
> It's delay bounded, and its limited with the value returned by
> function getMSDULifetime, which by default is 10 seconds, which is a
> very large value for delay.
Do yo
(http://cocus.info/).
** PUBLICATION **
All submitted papers will go through a peer review process. All
accepted papers will be made available in Association for Computing
Machinery (ACM) Digital Library.
** WORKSHOP CO-CHAIRS **
Claudio Cicconetti, [EMAIL PROTECTED], Univ. of Pisa, Italy
Mathieu L
ATION **
NSTools'07 is in technical cooperation with ACM SIGMETRICS and SIGSIM
All accepted papers will be made available in ACM Digital Library, as
well as indexed by EI and ISI Index.
** WORKSHOP CO-CHAIRS **
Claudio Cicconetti, [EMAIL PROTECTED], Univ. of Pisa, Italy
Mathieu Lacage, [EMAIL
hi nuno,
On Wed, 2008-03-12 at 15:06 +, Nuno Farias wrote:
> Hi,
> I've been studying NS3. My goal is to create a 802.11s module by
> extending 802.11 code (recently added by Mathieu Lacage).
cool !
> At this point I have some doubts that maybe someone could give some p
hi,
A couple of weeks ago, we discussed the possibility of creating a
mailing-list for ns-3 users to avoid the large traffic on the ns-users
mailing-list.
The group is now located there for web-based browsing and for
subscription: http://groups.google.com/group/ns-3-users
The email address to p
On Thu, 2009-04-09 at 15:59 +0200, ichrak amdouni wrote:
>
> I doubt that is the case with the default values of all
> parameters.
> Maybe you changed some parameters ?
>
>
> Yes, it is the case, the mac association succeed between an access
> point an
hi,
On Tue, 2006-01-10 at 09:37 -0200, Debora Meyhofer Ferreira wrote:
> I want to know if in this version I can simulate in a mixed scenario
> (wired cum wireless) different datarate in the same AP (infrastructure
I don't know of anyone who has been able to successfully simulate a
wired cum wir
