Yeah Renata, Newreno modifies Reno in the Fast Recovery phase to perform
better in the context of multiple packet losses in the same window. But my
question was different : why does the FullTcp variant of Newreno
(TCP/FullTcp/Newreno) perform differently than the normal Newreno
(TCP/Newreno) ?
-S
I didn't read the RFC yeat, but is there some modification in newreno? (
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3782.txt) Is there any comments in .cc header
files?
There are a lot of working groups about congestion and avoidance... there is
some difference about it in one of them (look for DCCP).
Regards, R
Hi all,
I was using FullTcp/Newreno agent and found that it behaved differently from
the normal TCP/Newreno in terms of congestion control. I am really not sure
about what is causing the difference. This difference is especially obvious
when the number of flows sharing a bottleneck link becomes hi
