RE: [BTMO] Re: Wigan - Roll Call

2010-10-16 Thread Rog & Reet
Damn, forgot to give you my other "prediction". Our first "tactical" sub will involve a left back. A forward for a left back, who plays in midfield. Then a midfielder for a forward with 5 minutes to go in a must win game. This modern game has me confused. Even more confusing are those who reckon w

Re: [BTMO] Re: Wigan - Roll Call

2010-10-16 Thread Steven Millward
Who posted below about getting O'Neill in? On 17 October 2010 02:45, paul wrote: > Jelle Van Rubbish! > > Why take Fletcher off when we have to win? > > Fingers crossed for a lucky late goal! > --Original Message-- > To: nswolves@googlegroups.com > Subject: Re: [BTMO] Re: Wigan - Roll Ca

RE: [BTMO] Re: Wigan - Roll Call

2010-10-16 Thread Jeremy Tonks
Well I don't know that we'll have to wait too much longer! _ From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Sunday, 17 October 2010 6:56 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [BTMO] Re: Wigan - Roll Call The good thing

Re: [BTMO] Re: Wigan - Roll Call

2010-10-16 Thread Steven Millward
The good thing about the Championship is that I wake up most Sundays to find out we have won. Much better. On 17 October 2010 02:45, paul wrote: > Jelle Van Rubbish! > > Why take Fletcher off when we have to win? > > Fingers crossed for a lucky late goal! > --Original Message-- > To: ns

Re: [BTMO] Re: Wigan - Roll Call

2010-10-16 Thread paul
Jelle Van Rubbish! Why take Fletcher off when we have to win? Fingers crossed for a lucky late goal! --Original Message-- To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [BTMO] Re: Wigan - Roll Call Sent: Oct 3, 2010 9:17 PM The sooner we appoint Martin O'Neil the better! MM is out of his de