This is all too positive – let’s talk cricket :-(
I thought after the tests we were serious World Cup contenders…
And suddenly our blokes are making Shane Watson look like he can run between
the wickets.
We haven’t got it for the WC.
_
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswo
: D
On 21 January 2011 21:52, Marcus Chantry wrote:
> In my opinion Jarvis is shite. The Actim Index somehow has him ranked as
> the 78th best player in the Premier League. Some stupid experienced managers
> allegedly want to pay 10m for him based on him being sub-standard for the
> England squad
In my opinion Jarvis is shite. The Actim Index somehow has him ranked as the
78th best player in the Premier League. Some stupid experienced managers
allegedly want to pay 10m for him based on him being sub-standard for the
England squad. I would rather Wolves had 10m in the bank than a pacey
I see, so you use stats to make a point but when it's pointed out that they
are specious, we are supposed to move on and ignore that it ever happened.
What a wonderful, magical world you inhabit.
I'd be happy with your email if you said:
"In my opinion Jarvis is shite, but I accept that it Actim
Don't let stats get in the way of a good story. The simple matter is Jarvis is
shite and if someone is willing to give us decent money for 2 or 4 assists from
21 games then show me the money. Hammill can't be any worse.
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com
To: ns
The comparable stats have Jarvis with 4 assists. It's only one goal
difference, which is hardly statistically significant. I note that the
Actim stats you use have Hahnemann in the Premier League team of the
season. They must be really good stats.
On 21 January 2011 21:23, Marcus Chantry wrote:
Reliable? WLWLWLWL
Rather put my trust in Bliar telling the truth.
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Friday, 21 January 2011 6:08 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Hammill
I don't see how you get much mor
I'm sure the Actim Index doesn't factor is the quality of the opponent but I'm
more than happy to flog Jarvis to the highest bidder. Aside from running around
a lot I don't think Jarvis has added anything that Ward couldn't provide (and
that's saying something).
I don't see how you can compare
And yet he got named in the provisional England squad at one point. We
established some time ago that he got between you and Mick in Perth and
that's why you hold a grudge.
As for comparing his and Hammill's Actim Index numbers, does that take
account of one playing against premier league opposit
And yet he got named in the provisional England squad at one point. We
established some time ago that he got between you and Mick in Perth and
that's why you hold a grudge.
As for comparing his and Hammill's Actim Index numbers, does that take
account of one playing against premier league opposit
Errrm... bet its . Jarvis ?
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Friday, 21 January 2011 5:08 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Hammill
I don't see how you get much more reliable than a Wolves player. I
11 matches
Mail list logo
