Everything that we know is poor in the team came back to the surface today.
Nenad's ability to sometimes crumble under pressure. Our non-performing left
back space. Our defence which doesn't communication with each other. A keeper
that has the very rare howler. A forward who will miss the open
Thank Mick's never going to get us into Europe then.
1-4 in Newcastle must equate to 0-24 in Turkey.
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Monday, 4 April 2011 8:29 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Ince
You can't just blame Elokobi, the whole backline were very poor, as was
Hennessy, we looked all out of shape right from the start.
This game showed how one dimensional we are, our whole game revolves
around Doyle and the wingers, Doyle missing and with the two wingers
kept very quiet.
In fairn
How about central defence who decided to let long balls bounce over their heads
while amiobi ran past them. Our defence was a shambles all game, not just poor
george.
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Sent: Mon Apr 04 13:39:12 20
We need a new left back!! Elokobi was shown up again big time!
Paul Crowe
Sales Manager - Asia Pacific
ConTech (Sydney Office)
PO Box 3517
Rhodes Waterside
Rhodes NSW 2138
Tel: 02 97396636 Fax: 02 97396542
Mob: 0406009562
Email: pcr...@contechengineering.com
Website: www.contec
The answer was stated early on... it was clear to all from the first
10-15mins, incl MM, that the Newcastle match was going to be a serious
scrap, esp with the likes of Nolan and Barton and Co. Also, it seemed to me
like there were Newcastle players everywhere in midfield, so Milijas wasnt
going to
Now we're getting close to a winning strategy. We need a more accurate
goalkeeper.
_
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Monday, 4 April 2011 9:53 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Ince
You can
That's exactly right yet you expect us to stay in the top tier of
English football with such players.
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Steven Millward
Sent: Monday, 4 April 2011 9:53 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Ince
You can't exepct everything for 175,000 pounds.
On 4 April 2011 09:44, Marcus Chantry wrote:
> You almost had me convinced there Steve, but then there is one major
> flaw, a huge flaw, an insurmountable flaw in your strategy; The strategy
> that was so well described relies on the ball winni
You almost had me convinced there Steve, but then there is one major
flaw, a huge flaw, an insurmountable flaw in your strategy; The
strategy that was so well described relies on the ball winning
midfielder to pass it to the creative midfielder and this is where the
flaw is for Wolves. Unless sai
You'll have to take this up with Rog. He's the biggest fan of 442. You
know that I prefer 451.
*Marcus's Management Education Tip #1*
*Overview*
In terms of who you have on the pitch in central midfield in 442, the choice
needs to support the following flow:
1. Win the ball
2. Give it to a fla
As the owner of the club and the board have clearly stated that they
will not be relieving Mick of his duties under any circumstances, it
would be a pointless exercise to discuss who I would rather have in
place of Thick Mick.
Aside from the complete lack of any organisation in the defence, the
Shrewsbury are looking good.
_
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Monday, 4 April 2011 8:40 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Ince
I am willing to admit that both Ince and Mooney have failed to
Thank-you. Now can you suggest a couple of other managers that you would
have in to replace Mick please? I feel unfair in asking you as it will
surely be the kiss-of-death for them but we should see anyway.
Perhaps Mick got the tactics wrong for this game. I don't feel the need to
defend him fo
I am willing to admit that both Ince and Mooney have failed to deliver
at their respective clubs, however, I am not aware of their individual
circumstances with regards to playing personnel, funds available to
them, the level of control they may been given to influence the
directions of their clubs
I raise Paul Ince because in spite of my repeated requests for you to
suggest an alternative to Mick, Ince and Richard Money are the only two that
you've ever suggested. (Money is currently unemployed, by the way, after
leaving conference side Luton Town last year).
If you know so much about what
Forget Paul Ince, he's not our manager and never will be. This is
simply a diversionary tactic to avoid discussing Thick Mick's own
inadequacies.
As Roger & I are the only ones who don't support Thick Mick, there
should be plenty of people on this list who can explain to me his
tactics in Sat
Everything is relative. We could have had Ince and been in League 1 by now.
On 4 April 2011 06:51, Rog & Reet wrote:
> Funny how other proven no-hopers still have jobs.
>
>
>
> *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On
> Behalf Of *Steven Millward
> *Sent:* Monda
Funny how other proven no-hopers still have jobs.
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Monday, 4 April 2011 5:31 AM
To: nswolves
Subject: [NSWolves] Ince
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/12951734.stm
Is this now sufficie
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/12951734.stm
Is this now sufficient proof that he would have been rubbish as Wolves
manager?
--
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.
20 matches
Mail list logo
