Looks like we should have gone for Butterfield instead of Clyne.
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of
pcr...@contechengineering.com
Sent: Wednesday, 3 February 2010 8:36 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject:
[mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of LEESE Matthew
Sent: Wednesday, 3 February 2010 8:45 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Oh to be a Wolves fan!!
Looks like we should have gone for Butterfield instead of Clyne.
From: nswolves
A defence? It wasn't the premier league!
_
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Wednesday, 3 February 2010 8:50 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Oh to be a Wolves fan!!
words cannot describe
[mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Wednesday, 3 February 2010 7:50 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Oh to be a Wolves fan!!
words cannot describe the excuse of a team that I've just watched play
against Palace. I must have missed the 1 shot
@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Oh to be a Wolves fan!!
Stearman has the uncanny knack of turning a 100% ball into a 50-50 (and Gia
looked the same), Hennessey still looks unsure, we still have a sub-PL
standard midfield, and didn't make any significant Jan signings. We'll be
battling
It would have been unbearable if Hull had beaten Chelsea!
_
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Mark Worrall
Sent: Wednesday, 3 February 2010 9:23 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Oh to be a Wolves fan!!
Stearman
