RE: [NTG-context] Not seeing the wood because of so many trees

I would second that. I can use it in computer program documentation for many different things. Greetings Dierk > -Original Message- > From: Thomas A.Schmitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 9:18 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [NTG-context] Not seein

Re: [NTG-context] Not seeing the wood because of so many trees

A couple of fonts, including Computer Modern Roman, do not have curly braces as glyphs. As Computer Modern Roman is the brick-and-mortar font of TeX, few people bother that there is no explicit token/command that evokes it. You have a point though. -- Johannes Hüsing There is something fascin

Re: [NTG-context] bfmath in nath

- Original Message - From: "David Munger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > bold omegas, so the problem has to be in t-nath.tex. > > Btw, this nath module is very useful to me. If I'd be able to do some > debugging into it, I sure would. Could you please point me to some > ConTeXt hacking references

Re: [NTG-context] t-nath difficulty

- Original Message - From: "William D. Neumann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Mon, 16 Feb 2004, Gary Pajer wrote: > > > In the following code, the first formula typesets as I want, and the > > second doesn't. But the syntax in the second looks correct. > > Bug or feature? or setup problem?

[NTG-context] bfmath in nath

Hello, The following outputs a nice bold displayed omega (the first one), and a thin normal inline one (the second one): \usemodule [nath] \setupbodyfont [12pt] \definebodyfont [12pt] [mm] [mibf=cmmib10 sa 1] \starttext \[\bfmath \omega\] $\bfmath \omega$ \stoptext Note that replacing nath with

Re: [NTG-context] live ConTeXt

Hi Piotr, There are several possibilities to get a running TeX-system. Normally the freely distributed CDs contain a fairly outdated set of files including also an aged ConTeXt-version. I would suggest to download TeX live from CTAN. Otherwise GUST should be able to provide you an up-to-date T

Re: [NTG-context] live ConTeXt

On Tue, 17 Feb 2004, Piotr Kopszak wrote: > As there are plenty of live linux distributions on CDs I was wondering > if there is one that includes ConTeXt. It should be relatively easy > to make one based on KNOPPIX (my computer is too weak though). Please, > let me know if you find one. ConT

Re: [NTG-context] Not seeing the wood because of so many trees

Sorry for going back to an older thread, but I don't think the question was answered properly. Alexander Klink wanted to know how to typeset "{" and "}". Suggestions were "\type|{| and \type|}|" or "$\{$ and $\}$". Neither of which is satisfactory, because it will typeset them either in typewri

[NTG-context] live ConTeXt

Good evening, As there are plenty of live linux distributions on CDs I was wondering if there is one that includes ConTeXt. It should be relatively easy to make one based on KNOPPIX (my computer is too weak though). Please, let me know if you find one. Piotr -- Piotr Kopszak, Ph.D.

RE: [NTG-context] Not seeing the wood because of so many trees

Hello Tobias and Alexander, both works. Thank you. I didnt know that I can use '|' instead of '{'}. But one thing does not work: {\bf $\{$} does not print the '{' bold faced :-( Is there a workaround for this problem? Greetings Dierk Höppner > -Original Message- > From: Tobias Burnu

Re: [NTG-context] Error with XML and JS

At 00:56 17/02/2004, you wrote: Hello, Continuing the ConTeXt exploration with Hans's help: I'm trying to combine Hans's JS programming with XML processing but an error pops up at the top of your document say: \useJSscripts[fld] %