On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 10:25:37 +0100, Hans Hagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> VnPenguin wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I'm looking for FAQ style (print & screen).
> > Thank you for your suggestion.
>
> taske a look at: s-faq-*.tex in the base directory
oh, I forgot to search in my box :)
Thank you so much,
Re
Hi Adam,
I did so right now (thanks for the hint!).
But in that file ther's only solved a case when each line of the
verbatim text is placed in a special tag:
Dit \is nogal verbatim !
Dit is {nogal} verbatim !
Dit is verbatim !
This is trivial because you can pass the contents of ea
Adam Lindsay wrote:
h h extern said this at Fri, 10 Dec 2004 22:38:27 +0100:
Also, what's the status of contml? I like the idea of it as a simple,
structural, basic markup that ConTeXt handles with zero effort, but is
anyone actually using it?
we sometimes mix it into other xml docs; i have no pro
Bruce D'Arcus wrote:
BTW, Hans, I've yet to see the ContML schema. Care to post it somewhere?
that was from the time that i played with schema's, nowadays i prefer relax
ng
the funny things can be used by some modules (in the
distribution) to filter definitions for documentation purposes;
htt
Adam Lindsay wrote:
I haven't looked at this in detail lately, and barely at all with the
pdftex drivers. Hans, do you think it would be hard to turn direct page
links into indirect links (point to page object)?
can you check this:
\def\doPDFbookmark level #1 n #2 text #3 page #4 open #5%
{\scrat
On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 10:25:37 +0100, Hans Hagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> VnPenguin wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I'm looking for FAQ style (print & screen).
> > Thank you for your suggestion.
>
> taske a look at: s-faq-*.tex in the base directory
>
Just tried with vietnamese :
begin cod
VnPenguin wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking for FAQ style (print & screen).
Thank you for your suggestion.
taske a look at: s-faq-*.tex in the base directory
-
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridde
Hi Dan,
of the scaling matrix in \doMPconcat.
ah, doMPconcat ... indeed a problematic one ...
I have written some modifications for supp-pdf that avoid all of these.
good, we needed a mathematician to do this -)
The current state of my code can be found at
http://comp.uark.edu/~luecking/tex/supp-
Richard Gabriel wrote:
Hi Adam,
I did so right now (thanks for the hint!).
But in that file ther's only solved a case when each line of the
verbatim text is placed in a special tag:
Dit \is nogal verbatim !
Dit is {nogal} verbatim !
Dit is verbatim !
This is trivial because you can pass
Matthias Weber wrote:
I am afraid your question is to vague to be answerable.
Hence here are two pieces of information that might or might not be useful:
i) Mathematica 5.1 can convert TeX to MathML, at least
to some extent. So it should at least in principle be possible to
convert carefully crafte
Hans et al,
OK, some questions.
You say "starting with pure tex," does this mean that if you start with
Context, then tex4ht is not an option?
Secondly, since I teach mathematics, anything I write is going to contain
a *lot* of mathematics and a lot of figures (graphs, etc). Is XML and
MATHML go
11 matches
Mail list logo