Hans Hagen wrote:
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
for that, but it doesn't take the baseline into consideration, so it
has to be manually tuned for every line, every font & every font size
(printed and compared if it looks OK).
\definelayer[text][height=\textheight,width=\textwidth]
\showgrid
\st
Brooks Moses wrote:
I just noticed that when I compile ConTeXt files with texexec -pdf, my
copy of Acrobat 5 complains about "the PDF version of this file is too
new for this viewer", but when I compile LaTeX files with pdflatex, I
don't get that complaint.
Is there some way to set ConTeXt a
(This came up on comp.text.tex in a question about LaTeX, but it also
applies to ConTeXt, and the proposed solution for LaTeX doesn't apply.)
Consider the following document:
\starttext
Some ligature tests: ff, fi, ffi, fl, ffl.
\stoptext
If I process that with texexex -pdf, load it into
Oh, one more thing
At 05:29 PM 7/26/2005, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
I'm looking forward to what my LaTeX colleagues will say about that
when I present them ConTeXt and the tricks like that :)
After you've had your fun with them, you can give them the
slovenianletters.sty file (and the associa
I just noticed that when I compile ConTeXt files with texexec -pdf, my copy
of Acrobat 5 complains about "the PDF version of this file is too new for
this viewer", but when I compile LaTeX files with pdflatex, I don't get
that complaint.
Is there some way to set ConTeXt and texexec to create P
At 05:29 PM 7/26/2005, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
Brooks Moses wrote:
> Ok; I've updated the versions on my website to include the other two extra
> characters as well.
>
>http://dpdx.net/context/slovenian/
>
> Does the test file look like it does all of the enumerations correctly now?
Only the f
Brooks Moses wrote:
> Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> >Brooks Moses wrote:
> >>So, anyhow, I wrote up a short third-party module to handle Slovenian
> >>character enumeration (can I presume that the rest of the alphabet
> >>ordering is the same as English?),
> >
> >Ordering is the same, but in English some
At 04:35 PM 7/26/2005, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
Brooks Moses wrote:
So, anyhow, I wrote up a short third-party module to handle Slovenian
character enumeration (can I presume that the rest of the alphabet
ordering is the same as English?),
Ordering is the same, but in English some very strange l
You people are just impossible, I have nothing else to say! I don't even
have time to test the first answer when already another three or five
posts appear on the list !!! If it is going to continue that way, I'll
soon become affraid of the (black) magic ruling the list :)
Thanks a lot. I di
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
for that, but it doesn't take the baseline into consideration, so it
has to be manually tuned for every line, every font & every font size
(printed and compared if it looks OK).
\definelayer[text][height=\textheight,width=\textwidth]
\showgrid
\starttext
\startstand
At 02:01 PM 7/26/2005, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
Hello Hans, Today I saw a webpage of someone, who is very active in the
field of translation and localisation of free software into Slovenian. It
astonished me the way he numered the items on his webpage: (a)
approximation ... (b) Gauss ... (c) numer
[...]
> No, this wouldn't make any sense. I was thinking about PDF to PNG
> conversion and bitwise comparison of the files, which could be made
> automatically. Each time a new version would be uploaded, the
> documents would be compiled, any compilation errors caught and any
> image differences
Steffen Wolfrum wrote:
But figure labels are needed (do they interfere?)
figure labels are part of the float
Hans
--
-
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Ha
Hi Mojca
Not right away, but any time in the future when unicode, fonts and
the future is now ...
\def\mojcaniannumber#1%
{\ifcase#1 \or m\or o\or j\or c\or a\or m\or i\or k\or l\or a\or v\or e\or
c\else
\expandafter\mojcaniannumber\expandafter{\the\numexpr#1-13\relax}\fi}
\defineconv
Patrick Gundlach wrote:
>
> >> It is perhaps a lot of work included, but extending the
> >> contextgarden.net in such a way that users could provide test cases
> >> which would be typeset with different ConTeXt versions and PNGs
> >> compared afterwards ... could make it easier to discover any bro
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
1.) I saw \hbox, \vbox, \vtop, \lbox, \cbox, \rbox, \sbox, \tbox,
\bbox on page 106 of cont-eni.pdf. But if I understand it properly,
there's no alternative to LaTeX \parbox command.
1.1.) After grep-ing the LaTeX tree for "\parbox", my disk ran out of space
1.2.) \bTABLE .
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
However, those people who really care, use the Slovenian alphabet when
enumerating (manually, of course). I'm proud, for example, that I was
in the class "1.Č" in the high school.
Not right away, but any time in the future when unicode, fonts and
similar will be updated/re
Thank you, Hans: I do like it when someone "beats me to the punch" :-)
I learned something, and on top of it I didn't
have to spend any time :-) (You got us all spoiled rottin, though)
Best, elena
P.S. And I do prefer the ConTeXt way of doing things rather than
using ConTeXt to do LaTeX (exce
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
This should actually be the only proper way to number items in
Slovenian, but you can imagine that nobody is able to use that since
the beginning of computer era. (Another example is the usage of
quotation marks: most people use the American quotation marks instead
of the G
Am 2005-07-26 um 00:08 schrieb Hans Hagen:
actually the code for that kind of trickery is already presen tfor
soem time, see m-pstric for an example; now, what we probably need
is a small extension to page-app, i.e. the command you want to
execute;
can you give an example of a lilipond call?
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
I don't know if there is any special agreement in case there are more
than 26 items in the list, but sometimes a, b, ... x, y, z, aa, ab,
ac, ... zz, aaa, aab, aac, ... is used. I never needed that many items
until now, but the issue could theoretically be interesting for t
Elena Fraboschi wrote:
Just a quick comment, since I cannot try anything in LiveContext right
at this time:
What you want is the equivalent of LaTeX's \marginpar , which is really
a \vtop whose beginning coincides with the beginning of the paragraph
being \note[d].
I am thinking that this woul
>> It is perhaps a lot of work included, but extending the
>> contextgarden.net in such a way that users could provide test cases
>> which would be typeset with different ConTeXt versions and PNGs
>> compared afterwards ... could make it easier to discover any broken
>> functionality.
It comes do
At 02:01 PM 7/26/2005, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
Hello Hans, Today I saw a webpage of someone, who is very active in the
field of translation and localisation of free software into Slovenian. It
astonished me the way he numered the items on his webpage: (a)
approximation ... (b) Gauss ... (c) numer
Hello Hans,
Today I saw a webpage of someone, who is very active in the field of
translation and localisation of free software into Slovenian. It
astonished me the way he numered the items on his webpage:
(a) approximation ...
(b) Gauss ...
(c) numerical solutions ...
(č) solving parabolic ... %
Hi Mojca,
[...]
> anyway. I mainly wrote this because of the problems in
> live.contextgarden.net which is not fixed yet (see
They should be fixed now. Sorry for the delay.
Patrick
--
ConTeXt wiki and more: http://contextgarden.net
___
ntg-context
Just a quick comment, since I cannot try anything in LiveContext right
at this time:
What you want is the equivalent of LaTeX's \marginpar , which is really
a \vtop whose beginning coincides with the beginning of the paragraph
being \note[d].
I am thinking that this would be a good test case for
Hello!
This time I have a task like this:
I have margin text blocks (like Note, Tip) that follow some paragraph in my document flow.
In the produced document I get them in margin, but vertically they are just below the paragraph (as in text flow)
I really need then to start exactly where the pr
Steffen Wolfrum wrote:
> Hi,
>
> it would be great if the \placefigure macro could be extended to
> combinations like
...
1.) This is not exactly the same thing, but if we're talking about
graphics: is it possible to include a figure (\externalfigure, perhaps
withing \placefigure) in such a way
Hans Hagen wrote:
> Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> > %%
> >
> > \documentclass{article}
> > \begin{document}
> > a box with a table:
> > \fbox{\begin{tabular}[c]{l}1\\2\\3\end{tabular}}\par
> >
> > a midaligned parbox: \parbox[c]{1em}{1 2 3}
> > \end{document}
> >
> > %%
> >
> watch the \\ !
Hans Hagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Steffen Wolfrum wrote:
> Hi,
>
> it would be great if the \placefigure macro could be extended to
> combinations like
>
> \placefigure{top,left}
>
> or
>
> \placefigure{bottom,outer}
>
>
> The reason for this request is that we use ConTeXt a l
Hans Hagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Steffen Wolfrum wrote:
> Hi,
>
> it would be great if the \placefigure macro could be extended to
> combinations like
>
> \placefigure{top,left}
>
> or
>
> \placefigure{bottom,outer}
>
>
> The reason for this request is that we use ConTeXt a l
Steffen Wolfrum wrote:
Hi,
it would be great if the \placefigure macro could be extended to
combinations like
\placefigure{top,left}
or
\placefigure{bottom,outer}
The reason for this request is that we use ConTeXt a lot for
typesetting books from "arts and humanities".
There we often
Steffen Wolfrum wrote:
Hi,
it would be great if the \placefigure macro could be extended to
combinations like
\placefigure{top,left}
or
\placefigure{bottom,outer}
The reason for this request is that we use ConTeXt a lot for
typesetting books from "arts and humanities".
There we often
Hi,
it would be great if the \placefigure macro could be extended to
combinations like
\placefigure{top,left}
or
\placefigure{bottom,outer}
The reason for this request is that we use ConTeXt a lot for
typesetting books from "arts and humanities".
There we often have to place a lot of (m
Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Hi,
I think I've found it.
You have generated the formats with the old texexec (version 5.2.4,
from tetex), but that should have been done with the new one
(5.4.2, from the zip file). My guess is that the old one is still
somewhere in root's search path.
The best way
Hi,
I think I've found it.
You have generated the formats with the old texexec (version 5.2.4,
from tetex), but that should have been done with the new one
(5.4.2, from the zip file). My guess is that the old one is still
somewhere in root's search path.
Cheers, Taco
Jessica Holle wrote:
U
On Mon, 25 Jul 2005 at 23:56:53+0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
> >>how do you define the graphic?
> >
> >\startreusableMPgraphic{kreis}
> > fill fullcircle scaled 1cm withcolor red;
> >\stopreusableMPgraphic
> >\starttext
> > \reuseMPgraphic{kreis}
> >\stoptext
> >
> >When I remove 'withcolor red
Jessica Holle wrote:
Hi,
I've done everything like described on the page you tell, but there
is a problem too
rzvlabwks:/usr/sbin # texexec --version
Can you show me the output of
texexec --make --all
please? Something went wrong at that stage, it seems.
Taco
It still doesn't work here. There have been complaints about arguments
not numeric on line 1889, but changing == to eq had no influence on the
final result. Still need an additional run.
As you said, the problem does not occur when you use runtime MP
processing, and would have gone unnoticed if
Hi,
I've done everything like described on the page you tell, but there
is a problem too
rzvlabwks:/usr/sbin # texexec --version
TeXExec 5.4.2 - ConTeXt / PRAGMA ADE 1997-2005
texexec : TeXExec 5.4.2 - ConTeXt / PRAGMA ADE
1997-2005
texutil : TeXUtil 9.0.0 - ConTe
Hans Hagen wrote:
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
It may actually be that the penalty for an underfull box is bigger
than for the overfull one. This explains strange placing of the
numbers then.
let's eee what taco says ... our tex source magician may knows the
dirty details
lines that cannot st
Jessica Holle wrote:
Hi,
I'm very new at the context section.
I've installed teTeX 3.0 from the sources and in the way it is
explained here:
http://tug.org/teTeX/tetex-src/QuickInstall
Everything works fine, I can compile my files.
Now I want to update my version 2005-01-31 to 2005-07-21
t
Hi,
I'm very new at the context section.
I've installed teTeX 3.0 from the sources and in the way it is
explained here:
http://tug.org/teTeX/tetex-src/QuickInstall
Everything works fine, I can compile my files.
Now I want to update my version 2005-01-31 to 2005-07-21
texexec --version give thi
Adam Lindsay wrote:
Hans Hagen said this at Tue, 26 Jul 2005 00:10:57 +0200:
recovering from a disk crach and running those generator scripts is a
stresstest -)
both but esp the huge files (those iso trees) on an overloaded machine are tricky (fro soem time i had only a few 100 m
Brooks Moses wrote:
At 04:28 PM 7/25/2005, you wrote:
Brooks Moses wrote:
I'd particularly appreciate any comments on the \newcommand and
counters implementations -- those are in the t-ltcmds and t-ltcnts
modules, though \newcommand also depends on t-lterrs and t-ltbase.
i just took a qu
Stuart Jansen wrote:
Okay, I give up. What's the most correct, easiest way to install ConTeXt
Until Hans' new files are on-line, this is definately the most
up-to-date intruction set:
http://contextgarden.net/TeTeX_3.0_installation
Cheers, Taco
__
47 matches
Mail list logo
