On Wed, 16 Nov 2005, Hans Hagen wrote:
Is there any possibility to get width=1cm ?
Not using \appliedfigure , but if you are willing
to mess with \unprotect:
\unprotect
\appendtoks
\writestatus{figures}{@@efwidth=\@@efwidth}
In the top of file type-pre.tex it can be read:
%D This file is obsolete. We now have latin modern and proper
%D typescripts. Forget about this file.
However, tracing execution of \startformula[bold] shows it is still
read then, whereas on \startformula (without the bold) it is not.
Addition to my previous message re this subject:
In the top of file type-pre.tex it can be read:
%D This file is obsolete. We now have latin modern and proper
%D typescripts. Forget about this file.
However, tracing execution of \startformula[bold] shows it is still
read then, whereas
In file type-enc.tex I came across the fontsynonym
\definefontsynonym [ComputerModernSans-Italic] [LMSans-
Italic]
However there is no further definition for LMSans-Italic. In contrast
to for example LMRoman-Italic.
Could this be a typo or a missing definition? Fontdefinitions
Hans van der Meer wrote:
In file type-enc.tex I came across the fontsynonym
\definefontsynonym [ComputerModernSans-Italic] [LMSans- Italic]
However there is no further definition for LMSans-Italic. In contrast
to for example LMRoman-Italic.
Could this be a typo or a missing
Alan Bowen said this at Thu, 17 Nov 2005 12:56:55 -0500:
I hope that we can resolve this—I need Fourier/Utopia for a book
series. But right now not even \quote works properly in the roman
typeface.
Sorry I haven't had the time to engage with this issue. There's
something suspect in your
Adam—
The default encoding used to be “texnansi” (it was set with a Greek
font that I am using) but now is now “ec”. Changing the encoding and
replacing
\usetypescript[type-syn]
\usetypescript[fourier][\defaultencoding]
\setupbodyfont[fourier,10.5pt]
with
Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Hans van der Meer wrote:
In file type-enc.tex I came across the fontsynonym
\definefontsynonym [ComputerModernSans-Italic] [LMSans-
Italic]
However there is no further definition for LMSans-Italic. In
contrast to for example LMRoman-Italic.
Could this be a
Hans van der Meer wrote:
Addition to my previous message re this subject:
In the top of file type-pre.tex it can be read:
%D This file is obsolete. We now have latin modern and proper
%D typescripts. Forget about this file.
However, tracing execution of \startformula[bold] shows it is
Hans Hagen wrote:
One more observation.
The trace shows an underfull hbox inserted at the start of this file
\readfilename -type-pre
(/usr/local/teTeX/share/texmf-local/tex/context/base/type-pre.tex
Underfull \hbox (badness 1) in paragraph at lines 21--13
Alan Bowen wrote:
Adam�
The default encoding used to be �texnansi� (it was set with a Greek
font that I am using) but now is now �ec�. Changing the encoding and
replacing
making texnansi default in the context distribution is a problem because
tex distributions mostly ship ec
Hans
It's been some time since I've tried anything other than the
computer modern fonts. I am aware of the manuals for font
instruction in Context, but if I want to pick up the topic again,
what links and/or manuals should I read, and in what order, to get
up-to-date instruction on handling
Hi Hasn en Taco,
sorry, that I caused this noise, stupid me used the wrong parameter! -
As usual Context works to expectation.
Willi
Hans Hagen wrote:
Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Willi Egger wrote:
Hi,
While developping a page-layout for a book I cam across the
following strange behaviour:
The following
@article{frechet,
author = M. {Fr\'echet},
title = {Sur quelques points du calcul fonctionel},
journal = Rendiconti Circ. Mat. Palermo,
volume = 22,
year = 1906,
pages = 1--74
}
produces an incorrect entry in the bbl file:
\startpublication[k=frechet,t=article,
Is there a pre-rolled bibliography style that looks follows
the AMS specs?
(BTW, when trying out various alternatives=
I found that only aps works, all of the others bomb
complaining extra # marks. I'm using a September 2005
version of t-bib ... do I need to upgrade?)
Giuseppe Bilotta wrote:
The defective s= key blows .bbl parsing.
An easy fix for this is unlikely, because the record
is confusing bibtex itself. This works ok:
@article{frechet,
author = M. Fr{\'e}chet,
title = {Sur quelques points du calcul fonctionel},
journal = Rendiconti Circ.
16 matches
Mail list logo
