Hans Hagen wrote:
> Aditya Mahajan wrote:
>
>>I wish Hermann Zapf had added these accents in Euler.
>>
>
> i'll pass the question when the occasion is there ...
>
>>Hans, why is mathring accent missing from all collections except
>>fourier?
>>
>
> dunno, and if taco does notknow it either,
On Thu, 14 Sep 2006, Hans Hagen wrote:
> Aditya Mahajan wrote:
>> On Thu, 14 Sep 2006, WN wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Hello,
>>> I need to use \dddot and \ot in one of my documents, does anyone
>>> know how to
>>> define these math symbols.
>>>
>>
>> The trouble is that most fonts do not contain these ac
Hans Hagen wrote:
> texexec --dvi test --nobackend
That works. As another test, using --output=dvi instead of --dvi
produces pdf even with --nobackend.
Just to be thorough, or difficult, I also tried
texexec test --nobackend
where pdftex is both front- and backend. It did the right thing (
On Sep 10, 2006, at 3:30 PM, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
>> [Taco: The reference to Knuth below comes out as (Knuth, 1981c) even
>> though there are no other 1981 entries for Knuth cited in the text.
>> Is that hard to fix given ConTeXt's way of dealing with bibtex, in
>> that it just incorporates the
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
>
> I wish Hermann Zapf had added these accents in Euler.
>
i'll pass the question when the occasion is there ...
> Hans, why is mathring accent missing from all collections except
> fourier?
>
dunno, and if taco does notknow it either, who knows -)
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> On 9/7/06, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> \setuppapersize[XY] is not working properly when paper orientation is
>> landscape. The following code results in pages of dimensions 29.5 x
>> 29.5 cm:
>>
>> \setuppapersize
>> [XY][A4,landscape]
>> \setuppaper
>
Sanjoy Mahajan wrote:
> Hans Hagen wrote:
>
>>> And, a small point of disagreement with the old man entry for texexec:
>>> 'texexec --output=dvi' produces pdf.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> line 116 in tex.rb in the ruby base path can be adapted:
>>
>> ['dvips','ps','dvi']
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Sep 2006, WN wrote:
>
>
>> Hello,
>> I need to use \dddot and \ot in one of my documents, does anyone
>> know how to
>> define these math symbols.
>>
>
> The trouble is that most fonts do not contain these accents.
> amsmath.sty gets over this definit
On Sep 14, 2006, at 11:27 AM, Matthias Weber wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I have tried updating ConTeXt with the result that any ConTeXt
> document results in the above
> error message :(
>
> I have re-installed everything (I hope - deleted teTeX from /usr/
> local/, and the ipackages folder
> from the
Thanks for the quick response, it works.
Wim
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Sep 2006, WN wrote:
>
>
>> Hello,
>> I need to use \dddot and \ot in one of my documents, does anyone
>> know how to
>> define these math symbols.
>>
>
> The trouble is that most fonts do not contain th
Dear all,
I have tried updating ConTeXt with the result that any ConTeXt
document results in the above
error message :(
I have re-installed everything (I hope - deleted teTeX from /usr/
local/, and the ipackages folder
from the home directory, then re-installed everything using
iinstaller) t
On Thu, 14 Sep 2006, WN wrote:
> Hello,
> I need to use \dddot and \ot in one of my documents, does anyone
> know how to
> define these math symbols.
The trouble is that most fonts do not contain these accents.
amsmath.sty gets over this definition by faking these symbols. It is
easy to por
Hans Hagen wrote:
> > And, a small point of disagreement with the old man entry for texexec:
> > 'texexec --output=dvi' produces pdf.
> >
> >
> line 116 in tex.rb in the ruby base path can be adapted:
>
> ['dvips','ps','dvi'] .each do |b|
> @@backends[b] = 'dvips
Hello,
I need to use \dddot and \ot in one of my documents, does anyone
know how to
define these math symbols.
Kind regards
Wim Neimeijer
___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
14 matches
Mail list logo
